AMAT vs. MPWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMAT and MPWR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMAT dominates in value with a market cap of 131.76 billion USD, eclipsing MPWR’s 32.49 billion USD by roughly 4.06×.
With betas of 1.71 for AMAT and 1.18 for MPWR, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AMAT | MPWR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Applied Materials, Inc. | Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Gary E. Dickerson | Mr. Michael R. Hsing |
| Price | 162.18 USD | 678.62 USD |
| Market Cap | 131.76 billion USD | 32.49 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.71 | 1.18 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | November 19, 2004 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMAT and MPWR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMAT and MPWR, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AMAT | MPWR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 19.46 | 17.76 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.87 | 0.83 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.69 | 13.61 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.94 | 9.94 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.20 | 51.88 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.04 | 49.74 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.69 | 13.35 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 22.22 | 50.86 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AMAT and MPWR offer similar dividend yields (0.99% vs. 0.78%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | AMAT | MPWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 0.78% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMAT and MPWR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AMAT (at 31.92) covers its interest payments, while MPWR shows “--” for minimal debt service.
| Symbol | AMAT | MPWR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.46 | 4.92 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.76 | 3.67 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.33 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.92 | -- |