Seek Returns

AMAT vs. MPWR: Applied Materials vs. Monolithic Power Systems Stock Comparison

How do Applied Materials (AMAT) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Applied Materials (AMAT) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) both belong to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, though AMAT is classified under Semiconductor Materials & Equipment while MPWR falls under Semiconductors.

Company profile comparison for Applied Materials (AMAT) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
Profile ItemAMATMPWR
NameApplied Materials Inc.Monolithic Power Systems Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS Industry GroupSemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
GICS Sub-IndustrySemiconductor Materials & EquipmentSemiconductors
Market Capitalization264.04 billion USD58.06 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNasdaq
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980November 19, 2004
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

AMAT
MPWR
GSPC
Loading price history…
Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Applied Materials (AMAT) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Applied Materials (AMAT) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Applied Materials (AMAT) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricAMATMPWR
Total Return (1Y)62.12%42.29%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)38.42%42.13%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)19.86%20.48%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

AMAT
MPWR
GSPC
Loading price history…
Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Applied Materials (AMAT) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Applied Materials (AMAT) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricAMATMPWR
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)63.72%57.22%
Beta (5Y)1.681.67
Max Drawdown (5Y)-55.80%-51.65%
Avg. Volume (3M)7.16M776.23K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
AMAT and MPWR are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Applied Materials (AMAT) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricAMATMPWR
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.910.66
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.350.98

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Applied Materials (AMAT) at 41.07% and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 24.47% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

AMAT

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

41.07%

Max
52.82%
AMAT
41.07%
Q3
22.26%
Median
10.58%
Q1
1.29%
Min
-16.89%

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

24.47%

Max
52.82%
MPWR
24.47%
Q3
22.26%
Median
10.58%
Q1
1.29%
Min
-16.89%
Loading chart…
Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their ROE against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Applied Materials (AMAT) at 30.05% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 23.89%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

AMAT

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

30.05%

Max
63.80%
AMAT
30.05%
Q3
28.36%
Median
11.44%
Q1
0.90%
Min
-37.77%

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

23.89%

Max
63.80%
Q3
28.36%
MPWR
23.89%
Median
11.44%
Q1
0.90%
Min
-37.77%
Loading chart…
Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their net margin against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Applied Materials (AMAT) at 33.74% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 29.75%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

AMAT

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

33.74%

Max
58.66%
AMAT
33.74%
Q3
30.23%
Median
15.91%
Q1
7.54%
Min
-25.74%

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

29.75%

Max
58.66%
Q3
30.23%
MPWR
29.75%
Median
15.91%
Q1
7.54%
Min
-25.74%
Loading chart…
Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their operating margin against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Applied Materials (AMAT) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricAMATMPWR
ROE (TTM)41.07%24.47%
ROA (TTM)15.48%15.52%
Net Margin (TTM)30.05%23.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)33.74%29.75%
Gross Margin (TTM)49.40%55.26%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 26.43% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Applied Materials (AMAT) at 4.39% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for MPWR.

Loading chart…
Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Applied Materials (AMAT) at 0.58% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at -64.85% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Applied Materials (AMAT) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricAMATMPWR
Revenue Growth (YoY)4.39%26.43%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)3.23%15.86%
EPS Growth (YoY)0.58%-64.85%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)5.19%12.43%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Applied Materials (AMAT) at 2.42 and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 3.70 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

AMAT

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

2.42

Max
10.33
Q3
5.62
Median
3.33
AMAT
2.42
Q1
2.35
Min
1.03

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

3.70

Max
10.33
Q3
5.62
MPWR
3.70
Median
3.33
Q1
2.35
Min
1.03
Loading chart…
Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their current ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Applied Materials (AMAT) at 0.29 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

AMAT

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

0.29

Max
1.46
Q3
0.65
AMAT
0.29
Median
0.27
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

0.01

Max
1.46
Q3
0.65
Median
0.27
Q1
0.04
MPWR
0.01
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Applied Materials (AMAT) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricAMATMPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.423.70
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.290.01
Net Debt / EBITDA-0.19-0.92

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 0.67% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Applied Materials (AMAT) at 0.62% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, MPWR the richer one.

AMAT

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

0.62%

Max
1.37%
Q3
0.65%
AMAT
0.62%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

0.67%

Max
1.37%
MPWR
0.67%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Applied Materials (AMAT) at 16.48% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 41.65% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

AMAT

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

16.48%

Max
49.64%
Q3
21.71%
AMAT
16.48%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

41.65%

Max
49.64%
MPWR
41.65%
Q3
21.71%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Applied Materials (AMAT) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricAMATMPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.62%0.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)16.48%41.65%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Applied Materials (AMAT) at 28.71 and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 65.27 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

AMAT

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

28.71

Max
110.34
Q3
66.81
Median
37.02
AMAT
28.71
Q1
23.96
Min
8.12

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

65.27

Max
110.34
Q3
66.81
MPWR
65.27
Median
37.02
Q1
23.96
Min
8.12
Loading chart…
Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Applied Materials (AMAT) at 8.56 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 15.53 sits in the pricier quartile — MPWR costs more per dollar of sales.

AMAT

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

8.56

Max
21.42
Q3
12.27
AMAT
8.56
Median
5.76
Q1
2.73
Min
0.00

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

15.53

Max
21.42
MPWR
15.53
Q3
12.27
Median
5.76
Q1
2.73
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both look rich against book: Applied Materials (AMAT) at 10.30 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 15.56 prices even higher, above its industry range.

AMAT

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

10.30

Max
14.06
AMAT
10.30
Q3
7.44
Median
4.29
Q1
2.30
Min
0.20

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

15.56

MPWR
15.56
Max
14.06
Q3
7.44
Median
4.29
Q1
2.30
Min
0.20
Loading chart…
Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Applied Materials (AMAT) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
MetricAMATMPWR
P/E Ratio (TTM)28.7165.27
P/S Ratio (TTM)8.5615.53
P/B Ratio (MRQ)10.3015.56
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)1.16%0.87%