Seek Returns logo

AMAT vs. IPGP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMAT and IPGP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMATIPGP
Company NameApplied Materials, Inc.IPG Photonics Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization173.28 billion USD3.71 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980December 13, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMAT and IPGP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMAT vs. IPGP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMATIPGP
5-Day Price Return-2.72%8.02%
13-Week Price Return11.32%18.88%
26-Week Price Return60.51%59.32%
52-Week Price Return8.68%19.77%
Month-to-Date Return6.24%10.83%
Year-to-Date Return33.75%20.70%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.44M0.22M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.70M0.23M
3-Month Volatility45.01%33.78%
Beta1.671.00

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMAT

35.91%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, AMAT’s Return on Equity of 35.91% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IPGP

-10.38%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

IPGP has a negative Return on Equity of -10.38%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AMAT vs. IPGP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMAT

23.88%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

AMAT’s Net Profit Margin of 23.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IPGP

-22.77%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

IPGP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -22.77%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AMAT vs. IPGP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMAT

30.14%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.14% places AMAT in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IPGP

-25.10%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

IPGP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -25.10%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AMAT vs. IPGP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMATIPGP
Return on Equity (TTM)35.91%-10.38%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.15%-9.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.88%-22.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)30.14%-25.10%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.50%34.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMAT

2.50

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

AMAT’s Current Ratio of 2.50 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

IPGP

6.79

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

IPGP’s Current Ratio of 6.79 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

AMAT vs. IPGP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMAT

0.32

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

AMAT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IPGP

0.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, IPGP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AMAT vs. IPGP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

41.21

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

AMAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 41.21 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IPGP

199.25

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 199.25, IPGP demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AMAT vs. IPGP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMATIPGP
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.506.79
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.695.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.320.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)41.21199.25

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMAT vs. IPGP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMAT vs. IPGP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMAT

0.80%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Yield of 0.80% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

IPGP

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

IPGP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMAT vs. IPGP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

19.73%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.73% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

IPGP

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

IPGP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMAT vs. IPGP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMATIPGP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.80%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.73%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

24.75

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

AMAT’s P/E Ratio of 24.75 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IPGP

--

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

P/E Ratio data for IPGP is currently unavailable.

AMAT vs. IPGP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMAT

5.91

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

AMAT’s P/S Ratio of 5.91 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IPGP

3.80

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

IPGP’s P/S Ratio of 3.80 is in the upper echelon for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AMAT vs. IPGP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMAT

7.83

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

AMAT’s P/B Ratio of 7.83 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

IPGP

1.39

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

IPGP’s P/B Ratio of 1.39 is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AMAT vs. IPGP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMATIPGP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.75--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.913.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.831.39
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.0424.09