AMAT vs. INTC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

AMAT’s market capitalization of 133.81 billion USD is substantially larger than INTC’s 87.50 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.66 for AMAT and 1.11 for INTC, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AMAT and INTC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

This section compares the market valuation of AMAT and INTC. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.

• INTC’s Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of -4.54 is negative. This indicates the company is currently not generating profit, a key factor that can weigh on its stock valuation and investor sentiment.
• AMAT’s Forward PEG ratio of 2.98 is very high, suggesting its stock might be overvalued if its price has substantially outrun its future earnings growth forecast. INTC’s Forward PEG ratio of -0.05 is negative, often an indicator of issues such as negative current earnings or anticipated earnings contraction, which calls its fundamental valuation into question.

Dividend Comparison

AMAT’s dividend yield of 1.00% is notably higher than INTC’s 0.62%, suggesting a stronger emphasis on returning cash to shareholders.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section evaluates the financial strength of AMAT and INTC. Noteworthy observations on their financial resilience, considered from an industry perspective, are detailed in the points that follow.

• INTC’s Interest Coverage Ratio (ICR) of -9.98 is negative. This signals that its current operating earnings are insufficient to meet its interest obligations, a critical red flag for its financial health and capacity to manage its debt.