AMAT vs. FOUR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMAT and FOUR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMAT dominates in value with a market cap of 131.76 billion USD, eclipsing FOUR’s 5.89 billion USD by roughly 22.36×.
With betas of 1.71 for AMAT and 1.80 for FOUR, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AMAT | FOUR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Applied Materials, Inc. | Shift4 Payments, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Gary E. Dickerson | Mr. Jared Isaacman |
| Price | 162.18 USD | 87.34 USD |
| Market Cap | 131.76 billion USD | 5.89 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.71 | 1.80 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | June 5, 2020 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMAT and FOUR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMAT and FOUR, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AMAT | FOUR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 19.46 | 27.08 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.87 | 1.65 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.69 | 1.70 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.94 | 7.34 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.20 | 12.47 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.04 | -20.81 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.69 | 2.19 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 22.22 | 16.10 |
Dividend Comparison
AMAT delivers a 0.99% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas FOUR appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AMAT | FOUR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMAT and FOUR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- FOUR is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 3.58), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to AMAT at 0.33, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
| Symbol | AMAT | FOUR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.46 | 1.36 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.76 | 1.36 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.33 | 3.58 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.58 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.92 | 3.05 |