AMAT vs. CSCO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMAT and CSCO, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
CSCO stands out with 251.43 billion USD in market value—about 1.91× AMAT’s market cap of 131.76 billion USD.
AMAT’s beta of 1.71 points to much larger expected swings compared to CSCO’s calmer 0.89, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AMAT | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Applied Materials, Inc. | Cisco Systems, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment |
| CEO | Mr. Gary E. Dickerson | Mr. Charles H. Robbins |
| Price | 162.18 USD | 63.2 USD |
| Market Cap | 131.76 billion USD | 251.43 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.71 | 0.89 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | February 16, 1990 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMAT and CSCO over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMAT and CSCO, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AMAT | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 19.46 | 25.69 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.87 | 3.65 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.69 | 4.52 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.94 | 5.48 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.20 | 18.64 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.04 | 25.92 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.69 | 4.90 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 22.22 | 20.20 |
Dividend Comparison
CSCO stands out with a 2.55% dividend yield—around 158% above AMAT’s 0.99%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | AMAT | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 2.55% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMAT and CSCO, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- CSCO’s current ratio of 0.95 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AMAT at 2.46 maintains healthy liquidity.
- AMAT meets its interest obligations (ratio 31.92). In stark contrast, CSCO’s negative ratio (-13.99) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | AMAT | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.46 | 0.95 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.76 | 0.87 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.33 | 0.64 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.24 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.92 | -13.99 |