AMAT vs. ASML: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMAT and ASML, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML stands out with 289.86 billion USD in market value—about 2.20× AMAT’s market cap of 131.76 billion USD.
With betas of 1.71 for AMAT and 1.22 for ASML, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
ASML is an ADR, letting U.S. buyers tap its non-U.S. business directly, unlike AMAT, which is purely domestic.
| Symbol | AMAT | ASML |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Applied Materials, Inc. | ASML Holding N.V. |
| Country | US | NL |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Gary E. Dickerson | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet |
| Price | 162.18 USD | 737.17 USD |
| Market Cap | 131.76 billion USD | 289.86 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.71 | 1.22 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | March 15, 1995 |
| ADR | No | Yes |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMAT and ASML over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMAT and ASML, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AMAT | ASML |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 19.46 | 29.38 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.87 | 1.80 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.69 | 8.35 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.94 | 14.61 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.20 | 27.61 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.04 | 21.83 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.69 | 8.17 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 22.22 | 27.02 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AMAT and ASML offer similar dividend yields (0.99% vs. 0.98%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | AMAT | ASML |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 0.98% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMAT and ASML, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AMAT (at 31.92) covers its interest payments, while ASML shows “--” for minimal debt service.
| Symbol | AMAT | ASML |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.46 | 1.52 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.76 | 0.91 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.33 | 0.21 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.08 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.92 | -- |