Seek Returns logo

ALV vs. MGA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ALV and MGA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolALVMGA
Company NameAutoliv, Inc.Magna International Inc.
CountrySwedenCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization9.17 billion USD13.81 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 28, 1997October 5, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ALV and MGA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ALV vs. MGA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolALVMGA
5-Day Price Return-1.28%-0.06%
13-Week Price Return2.03%11.54%
26-Week Price Return18.26%35.42%
52-Week Price Return19.22%11.13%
Month-to-Date Return3.39%3.98%
Year-to-Date Return28.76%14.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.52M1.30M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.65M1.01M
3-Month Volatility21.30%26.93%
Beta1.351.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ALV

31.27%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.69%
Q3
11.79%
Median
7.47%
Q1
4.51%
Min
-2.79%

ALV’s Return on Equity of 31.27% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Automobile Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MGA

8.55%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.69%
Q3
11.79%
Median
7.47%
Q1
4.51%
Min
-2.79%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 8.55% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ALV vs. MGA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ALV

7.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.12%
Q3
7.20%
Median
4.94%
Q1
1.95%
Min
-3.89%

ALV’s Net Profit Margin of 7.10% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MGA

2.47%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.12%
Q3
7.20%
Median
4.94%
Q1
1.95%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.47% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ALV vs. MGA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ALV

10.56%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
19.04%
Q3
10.47%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.48%
Min
-2.44%

An Operating Profit Margin of 10.56% places ALV in the upper quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MGA

3.77%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
19.04%
Q3
10.47%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.48%
Min
-2.44%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.77% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ALV vs. MGA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolALVMGA
Return on Equity (TTM)31.27%8.55%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.18%3.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.10%2.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.56%3.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.51%13.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ALV

0.95

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.42
Min
0.79

ALV’s Current Ratio of 0.95 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MGA

1.18

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.42
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.18 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ALV vs. MGA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ALV

0.80

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.66
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

ALV’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Automobile Components industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MGA

0.43

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.66
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.43 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ALV vs. MGA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ALV

10.94

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
36.86
Median
11.36
Q1
4.46
Min
-21.51

ALV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.94 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
36.86
Median
11.36
Q1
4.46
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ALV vs. MGA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolALVMGA
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.951.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.650.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.800.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.948.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

ALV vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ALV vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ALV

2.51%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
3.13%
Median
2.50%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

ALV’s Dividend Yield of 2.51% is consistent with its peers in the Automobile Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MGA

3.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
3.13%
Median
2.50%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.91%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ALV vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ALV

30.24%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
62.52%
Median
37.81%
Q1
27.27%
Min
0.00%

ALV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.24% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MGA

52.47%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
62.52%
Median
37.81%
Q1
27.27%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 52.47% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ALV vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolALVMGA
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.51%3.91%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.24%52.47%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ALV

12.05

Automobile Components Industry

Max
28.01
Q3
22.74
Median
15.58
Q1
12.96
Min
2.71

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, ALV’s P/E Ratio of 12.05 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MGA

13.40

Automobile Components Industry

Max
28.01
Q3
22.74
Median
15.58
Q1
12.96
Min
2.71

MGA’s P/E Ratio of 13.40 is within the middle range for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ALV vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ALV

0.86

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.05
Q3
1.12
Median
0.78
Q1
0.46
Min
0.08

ALV’s P/S Ratio of 0.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MGA

0.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.05
Q3
1.12
Median
0.78
Q1
0.46
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.33 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ALV vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ALV

3.68

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.68
Q3
2.06
Median
1.25
Q1
0.90
Min
0.46

ALV’s P/B Ratio of 3.68 is in the upper tier for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MGA

1.05

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.68
Q3
2.06
Median
1.25
Q1
0.90
Min
0.46

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 1.05 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ALV vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobile Components industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolALVMGA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.0513.40
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.860.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.681.05
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.256.22