Seek Returns logo

ALNY vs. MDT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ALNY and MDT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

MDT’s market capitalization of 113.25 billion USD is significantly greater than ALNY’s 43.28 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

MDT carries a higher beta at 0.81, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ALNY (beta: 0.21) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolALNYMDT
Company NameAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Medtronic plc
CountryUSIE
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryBiotechnologyMedical - Devices
CEOYvonne L. GreenstreetGeoffrey Straub Martha
Price331.91 USD88.39 USD
Market Cap43.28 billion USD113.25 billion USD
Beta0.210.81
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateJune 1, 2004May 2, 1973
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ALNY and MDT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ALNY vs. MDT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ALNY

-509.33%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.39%
Q3
-6.30%
Median
-32.82%
Q1
-68.26%
Min
-147.61%

ALNY has a negative Return on Equity of -509.33%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MDT

9.62%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
49.04%
Q3
9.53%
Median
-7.46%
Q1
-32.83%
Min
-82.64%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, MDT’s Return on Equity of 9.62% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Biotechnology and Medical - Devices industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ALNY

-2.79%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
48.74%
Q3
-10.68%
Median
-31.65%
Q1
-52.92%
Min
-113.69%

ALNY has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -2.79%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

MDT

6.08%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
21.88%
Q3
6.63%
Median
-1.11%
Q1
-21.08%
Min
-51.95%

MDT’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.08% is in line with the norm for the Medical - Devices industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Biotechnology and Medical - Devices industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ALNY

-11.49%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
87.75%
Q3
-5.05%
Median
-103.44%
Q1
-1,032.77%
Min
-2,366.07%

ALNY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -11.49%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MDT

13.90%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
44.80%
Q3
9.77%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-29.37%
Min
-87.68%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.90% places MDT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Biotechnology and Medical - Devices industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ALNY

-4.91%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
87.75%
Q3
-3.28%
Median
-115.26%
Q1
-1,188.86%
Min
-2,943.30%

ALNY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.91%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MDT

17.76%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
30.13%
Q3
13.12%
Median
3.47%
Q1
-24.42%
Min
-80.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.76% places MDT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Biotechnology and Medical - Devices industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolALNYMDT
Return on Equity (TTM)-509.33%9.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)-6.40%5.09%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-2.79%6.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-11.49%13.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-4.91%17.76%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)86.01%64.06%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ALNY

3.04

Biotechnology Industry

Max
28.73
Q3
13.97
Median
6.31
Q1
3.60
Min
0.02

ALNY’s Current Ratio of 3.04 falls into the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MDT

1.85

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
12.68
Q3
6.30
Median
4.05
Q1
1.85
Min
0.01

MDT’s Current Ratio of 1.85 aligns with the median group of the Medical - Devices industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Biotechnology and Medical - Devices industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ALNY

11.28

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.46
Q3
0.22
Median
0.06
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 11.28, ALNY operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Biotechnology industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MDT

0.59

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.09
Median
0.37
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

MDT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Medical - Devices industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Biotechnology and Medical - Devices industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ALNY

-0.79

Biotechnology Industry

Max
108.32
Q3
-0.55
Median
-8.49
Q1
-74.83
Min
-168.36

ALNY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.79. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MDT

8.17

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
18.18
Q3
7.53
Median
0.85
Q1
-9.80
Min
-33.94

MDT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.17 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Biotechnology and Medical - Devices industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolALNYMDT
Current Ratio (TTM)3.041.85
Quick Ratio (TTM)2.981.42
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)11.280.59
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.310.31
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-1.853.16
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.798.17

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ALNY and MDT. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ALNY

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ALNY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MDT

3.18%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
3.57%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.18%, MDT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Biotechnology and Medical - Devices industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ALNY

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ALNY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MDT

76.97%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
102.12%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MDT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 76.97% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Biotechnology and Medical - Devices industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolALNYMDT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%76.97%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ALNY

-159.59

Biotechnology Industry

Max
78.44
Q3
48.98
Median
20.50
Q1
12.64
Min
2.14

ALNY has a negative P/E Ratio of -159.59. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

MDT

24.31

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
90.56
Q3
56.92
Median
43.19
Q1
21.79
Min
5.55

MDT’s P/E Ratio of 24.31 is within the middle range for the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Biotechnology and Medical - Devices industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ALNY

-43.29

Biotechnology Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.10
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.02

ALNY has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -43.29. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

MDT

3.03

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
6.56
Q3
3.52
Median
2.22
Q1
0.55
Min
0.03

MDT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.03 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Biotechnology and Medical - Devices industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ALNY

18.43

Biotechnology Industry

Max
110.90
Q3
59.76
Median
11.33
Q1
4.45
Min
0.17

ALNY’s P/S Ratio of 18.43 aligns with the market consensus for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MDT

3.38

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
15.74
Q3
8.12
Median
3.40
Q1
2.37
Min
0.42

MDT’s P/S Ratio of 3.38 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Biotechnology and Medical - Devices industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ALNY

372.86

Biotechnology Industry

Max
15.78
Q3
7.44
Median
3.31
Q1
1.58
Min
0.31

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Biotechnology industry.

MDT

2.36

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
16.65
Q3
8.03
Median
3.73
Q1
1.92
Min
0.65

MDT’s P/B Ratio of 2.36 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Devices industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ALNY vs. MDT: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Biotechnology and Medical - Devices industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolALNYMDT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-159.5924.31
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-43.293.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)18.433.38
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)372.862.36
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-574.0821.84
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-285.3216.76
EV-to-Sales (TTM)18.554.16