ALNY vs. CAH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

With ALNY at 38.15 billion USD and CAH at 36.59 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.

CAH carries a higher beta at 0.67, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ALNY remains steadier at 0.17.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ALNY and CAH over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALNY and CAH based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• ALNY posts a negative P/E of -140.68, reflecting last year’s net loss, while CAH at 23.62 signals healthy earnings.
• ALNY posts a negative forward PEG of -38.16, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas CAH at 1.95 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
• CAH carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -12.48, indicating negative equity. In contrast, ALNY (P/B 328.68) has positive book value.
• ALNY has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -506.05, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, CAH (P/FCF 15.00) indicates positive free cash flow generation.

Dividend Comparison

ALNY offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while CAH provides a 1.32% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ALNY and CAH, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• CAH’s current ratio of 0.94 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ALNY at 3.04 maintains healthy liquidity.
• CAH posts a quick ratio of 0.50, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ALNY at 2.98 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
• ALNY carries high leverage (debt-to-equity ratio 11.28), whereas CAH has negative equity (-2.60), each presenting distinct capital-structure concerns.
• With negative EBIT (-0.79), ALNY cannot cover its interest payments. CAH, with an interest coverage of 15.45, meets its interest obligations.