Seek Returns logo

ALC vs. FMS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ALC and FMS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ALC’s market capitalization of 43.42 billion USD is substantially larger than FMS’s 16.50 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 0.70 for ALC and 0.85 for FMS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

FMS is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. ALC, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolALCFMS
Company NameAlcon Inc.Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA
CountryCHDE
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Care Facilities
CEODavid J. EndicottHelen Giza
Price87.78 USD28.12 USD
Market Cap43.42 billion USD16.50 billion USD
Beta0.700.85
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateApril 9, 2019September 17, 1996
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ALC and FMS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ALC vs. FMS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ALC

6.95%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
26.65%
Q3
13.00%
Median
1.08%
Q1
-8.11%
Min
-38.20%

ALC’s Return on Equity of 6.95% is on par with the norm for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FMS

4.38%

Medical - Care Facilities Industry

Max
37.16%
Q3
13.80%
Median
6.51%
Q1
-11.55%
Min
-43.55%

FMS’s Return on Equity of 4.38% is on par with the norm for the Medical - Care Facilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Care Facilities industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ALC

4.39%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
20.14%
Q3
7.36%
Median
1.97%
Q1
-6.22%
Min
-20.00%

ALC’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.39% is in line with the norm for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

FMS

3.65%

Medical - Care Facilities Industry

Max
20.36%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.41%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-9.00%

FMS’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.65% is in line with the norm for the Medical - Care Facilities industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Care Facilities industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ALC

11.27%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
28.95%
Q3
11.24%
Median
-2.83%
Q1
-12.85%
Min
-26.41%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.27% places ALC in the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FMS

3.17%

Medical - Care Facilities Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
6.23%
Median
3.17%
Q1
-3.80%
Min
-13.43%

FMS’s Net Profit Margin of 3.17% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Medical - Care Facilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Care Facilities industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ALC

15.22%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
32.10%
Q3
16.03%
Median
2.28%
Q1
-7.96%
Min
-26.84%

ALC’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.22% is around the midpoint for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FMS

7.58%

Medical - Care Facilities Industry

Max
17.86%
Q3
10.40%
Median
6.40%
Q1
0.40%
Min
-10.86%

FMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.58% is around the midpoint for the Medical - Care Facilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Care Facilities industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolALCFMS
Return on Equity (TTM)6.95%4.38%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.61%1.89%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.39%3.65%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.27%3.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.22%7.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.55%24.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ALC

2.70

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
4.57
Median
2.64
Q1
1.81
Min
1.10

ALC’s Current Ratio of 2.70 aligns with the median group of the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FMS

1.46

Medical - Care Facilities Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.76
Median
1.35
Q1
1.12
Min
0.57

FMS’s Current Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the median group of the Medical - Care Facilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Care Facilities industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ALC

0.24

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.16
Min
0.03

ALC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.24 is typical for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FMS

0.75

Medical - Care Facilities Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.40
Median
0.76
Q1
0.26
Min
0.01

FMS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.75 is typical for the Medical - Care Facilities industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Care Facilities industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ALC

7.72

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
25.04
Q3
8.80
Median
3.66
Q1
-3.85
Min
-11.93

ALC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.72 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FMS

3.70

Medical - Care Facilities Industry

Max
16.29
Q3
6.85
Median
2.93
Q1
0.35
Min
-7.11

FMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.70 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Medical - Care Facilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Care Facilities industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolALCFMS
Current Ratio (TTM)2.701.46
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.661.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.240.75
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.170.33
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.543.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.723.70

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ALC and FMS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ALC

0.38%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
4.02%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.38%, ALC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FMS

2.80%

Medical - Care Facilities Industry

Max
2.79%
Q3
0.08%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FMS’s Dividend Yield of 2.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Medical - Care Facilities industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Care Facilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ALC

11.23%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
76.77%
Q3
11.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ALC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.23% is within the typical range for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FMS

56.48%

Medical - Care Facilities Industry

Max
56.48%
Q3
4.48%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 56.48% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Care Facilities industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Care Facilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolALCFMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.38%2.80%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)11.23%56.48%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ALC

38.80

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
45.65
Q3
44.10
Median
35.47
Q1
29.60
Min
21.65

ALC’s P/E Ratio of 38.80 is within the middle range for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FMS

22.67

Medical - Care Facilities Industry

Max
40.40
Q3
28.24
Median
24.89
Q1
13.53
Min
8.53

FMS’s P/E Ratio of 22.67 is within the middle range for the Medical - Care Facilities industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Care Facilities industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ALC

2.54

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
5.80
Q3
3.68
Median
2.56
Q1
1.87
Min
0.22

ALC’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.54 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

FMS

1.68

Medical - Care Facilities Industry

Max
4.23
Q3
3.06
Median
1.16
Q1
0.77
Min
0.04

FMS’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.68 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Care Facilities industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Care Facilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ALC

4.37

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
12.87
Q3
6.95
Median
3.45
Q1
2.24
Min
0.71

ALC’s P/S Ratio of 4.37 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FMS

0.72

Medical - Care Facilities Industry

Max
2.38
Q3
1.50
Median
0.79
Q1
0.49
Min
0.04

FMS’s P/S Ratio of 0.72 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Care Facilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Care Facilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ALC

1.98

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
9.60
Q3
5.48
Median
3.37
Q1
1.95
Min
0.65

ALC’s P/B Ratio of 1.98 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FMS

0.97

Medical - Care Facilities Industry

Max
7.73
Q3
4.07
Median
2.16
Q1
1.44
Min
0.66

FMS’s P/B Ratio of 0.97 is in the lower quartile for the Medical - Care Facilities industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ALC vs. FMS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Medical - Instruments & Supplies and Medical - Care Facilities industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolALCFMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)38.8022.67
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.541.68
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)4.370.72
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.980.97
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)25.247.07
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)19.189.12
EV-to-Sales (TTM)4.751.22