ALB vs. WPM: Albemarle vs. Wheaton Precious Metals Stock Comparison
How do Albemarle (ALB) and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Albemarle (ALB) and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) both fall under the Materials industry group, but ALB is classified in Chemicals while WPM is classified in Metals & Mining.
| Profile Item | ALB | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Albemarle Corporation | Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Gold |
| Market Capitalization | 11.71 billion USD | 61.91 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 22, 1994 | July 6, 2005 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ALB | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.28% | 45.35% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.80% | 50.60% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.74% | 29.06% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Albemarle (ALB) has an aggressive beta of 1.32, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) is defensive at 0.49 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | ALB | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 53.59% | 52.11% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.49 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -83.90% | -43.29% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.40M | 2.01M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ALB | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | 0.79 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.08 | 1.14 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 23.10% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 7.05% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for WPM.
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
WPM
Materials industry group
23.10%
- Max
- 52.88%
- WPM
- 23.10%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 60.39% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
WPM
Materials industry group
60.39%
- WPM
- 60.39%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 66.70% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
WPM
Materials industry group
66.70%
- WPM
- 66.70%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ALB | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.05% | 23.10% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.95% | 15.22% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 60.39% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.74% | 66.70% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.17% | 86.61% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 80.18% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) reports EPS growth of 177.85%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ALB | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.37% | 80.18% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.10% | 29.53% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 177.85% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 29.83% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 0.57 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for WPM.
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
WPM
Materials industry group
0.57
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- WPM
- 0.57
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 0.18 and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 0.16 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
WPM
Materials industry group
0.16
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- WPM
- 0.16
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ALB | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 0.57 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.18 | 0.16 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | 0.50 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.65% and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 0.57% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WPM
Materials industry group
0.57%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- WPM
- 0.57%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 39.16% and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 16.29% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WPM
Materials industry group
16.29%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- WPM
- 16.29%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ALB | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.65% | 0.57% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.16% | 16.29% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 29.63 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
WPM
Materials industry group
29.63
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- WPM
- 29.63
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 17.86 clears its benchmark range — WPM looks notably rich on sales.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
WPM
Materials industry group
17.86
- WPM
- 17.86
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) at 6.17 carries an above-peer premium to book — WPM is pricier on assets.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
WPM
Materials industry group
6.17
- Max
- 6.59
- WPM
- 6.17
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ALB | WPM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.92 | 29.63 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 17.86 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 6.17 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.67% | -5.11% |