ALB vs. VALE: Albemarle vs. Vale Stock Comparison
How do Albemarle (ALB) and Vale (VALE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Albemarle (ALB) and Vale (VALE) both fall under the Materials industry group, but ALB is classified in Chemicals while VALE is classified in Metals & Mining.
Albemarle (ALB) trades as ordinary local shares, while Vale (VALE) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | ALB | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Albemarle Corporation | Vale S.A. American Depositary Shares |
| Country/Region | United States | Brazil |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Steel |
| Market Capitalization | 11.71 billion USD | 49.32 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 22, 1994 | March 21, 2002 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ALB | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.28% | 6.20% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.80% | 3.12% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.74% | 8.31% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Albemarle (ALB) has an aggressive beta of 1.32, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Vale (VALE) is defensive at 0.48 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | ALB | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 53.59% | 33.88% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.48 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -83.90% | -49.81% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.40M | 32.62M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ALB | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | 0.06 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.08 | 0.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 7.05% and Vale (VALE) at 0.26% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
VALE
Materials industry group
0.26%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- VALE
- 0.26%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08% and Vale (VALE) at 1.01% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
VALE
Materials industry group
1.01%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- VALE
- 1.01%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74% and Vale (VALE) at 19.31% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
VALE
Materials industry group
19.31%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- VALE
- 19.31%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ALB | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.05% | 0.26% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.95% | 6.97% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 1.01% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.74% | 19.31% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.17% | 32.06% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Vale (VALE) at 0.91% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Vale (VALE) reports EPS growth of -61.81%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ALB | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.37% | 0.91% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.10% | -4.32% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -61.81% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -48.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Vale (VALE) at 1.10 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for VALE.
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
VALE
Materials industry group
1.10
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- VALE
- 1.10
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 0.18 and Vale (VALE) at 0.55 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
VALE
Materials industry group
0.55
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- VALE
- 0.55
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ALB | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 1.10 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.18 | 0.55 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | 1.20 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Albemarle (ALB) at 1.65% pays an industry-typical yield; Vale (VALE) at 49.02% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VALE
Materials industry group
49.02%
- VALE
- 49.02%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Vale (VALE) reports payout ratio above 100% at 526.96%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Albemarle (ALB) reports 39.16%, ranking against industry peers normally.
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VALE
Materials industry group
526.96%
- VALE
- 526.96%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ALB | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.65% | 49.02% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.16% | 526.96% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Vale (VALE) at 72.44 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for VALE’s trailing earnings.
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
VALE
Materials industry group
72.44
- VALE
- 72.44
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Vale (VALE) at 0.23 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 prices around its industry’s middle — VALE costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
VALE
Materials industry group
0.23
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- VALE
- 0.23
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 and Vale (VALE) at 1.27 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
VALE
Materials industry group
1.27
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- VALE
- 1.27
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ALB | VALE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.92 | 72.44 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 0.23 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 1.27 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.67% | 17.51% |