ALB vs. RPM: Albemarle vs. RPM Stock Comparison
How do Albemarle (ALB) and RPM (RPM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Albemarle (ALB) and RPM (RPM) are both classified in the Specialty Chemicals sub-industry within the broader Chemicals industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | ALB | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Albemarle Corporation | RPM International Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 11.71 billion USD | 13.18 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 22, 1994 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ALB | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.28% | 1.43% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.80% | 5.53% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.74% | 5.33% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ALB | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 53.59% | 31.14% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 1.00 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -83.90% | -31.97% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.40M | 1.29M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ALB | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | -0.09 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.08 | -0.15 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
RPM (RPM) at 21.15% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 7.05% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for RPM.
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
RPM
Materials industry group
21.15%
- Max
- 52.88%
- RPM
- 21.15%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08% and RPM (RPM) at 8.66% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
RPM
Materials industry group
8.66%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- RPM
- 8.66%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74% and RPM (RPM) at 16.20% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
RPM
Materials industry group
16.20%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- RPM
- 16.20%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ALB | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.05% | 21.15% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.95% | 7.88% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 8.66% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.74% | 16.20% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.17% | 41.17% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
RPM (RPM) at 6.66% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: RPM (RPM) reports EPS growth of -3.36%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ALB | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.37% | 6.66% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.10% | 2.71% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -3.36% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 11.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 and RPM (RPM) at 1.76 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
RPM
Materials industry group
1.76
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- RPM
- 1.76
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 0.18 and RPM (RPM) at 0.79 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
RPM
Materials industry group
0.79
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- RPM
- 0.79
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ALB | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 1.76 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.18 | 0.79 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | 1.97 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
RPM (RPM) at 2.05% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Albemarle (ALB) at 1.65% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, RPM the richer one.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RPM
Materials industry group
2.05%
- Max
- 4.52%
- RPM
- 2.05%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 39.16% and RPM (RPM) at 39.93% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RPM
Materials industry group
39.93%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- RPM
- 39.93%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ALB | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.65% | 2.05% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.16% | 39.93% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 and RPM (RPM) at 19.10 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
RPM
Materials industry group
19.10
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- RPM
- 19.10
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 and RPM (RPM) at 1.65 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
RPM
Materials industry group
1.65
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- RPM
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while RPM (RPM) at 3.79 carries an above-peer premium to book — RPM is pricier on assets.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
RPM
Materials industry group
3.79
- Max
- 6.59
- RPM
- 3.79
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ALB | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.92 | 19.10 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 1.65 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 3.79 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.67% | 4.20% |