ALB vs. RGLD: Albemarle vs. Royal Gold Stock Comparison
How do Albemarle (ALB) and Royal Gold (RGLD) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Albemarle (ALB) and Royal Gold (RGLD) both fall under the Materials industry group, but ALB is classified in Chemicals while RGLD is classified in Metals & Mining.
| Profile Item | ALB | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Albemarle Corporation | Royal Gold, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Gold |
| Market Capitalization | 11.71 billion USD | 22.47 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | February 22, 1994 | June 9, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ALB | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.28% | 60.60% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.80% | 39.65% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.74% | 23.26% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Albemarle (ALB) has an aggressive beta of 1.32, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Royal Gold (RGLD) is defensive at 0.39 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | ALB | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 53.59% | 41.91% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.39 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -83.90% | -40.73% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.40M | 667.01K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ALB | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | 1.34 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.08 | 2.00 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 7.05% and Royal Gold (RGLD) at 15.03% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
RGLD
Materials industry group
15.03%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- RGLD
- 15.03%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 47.99% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
RGLD
Materials industry group
47.99%
- RGLD
- 47.99%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 65.85% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
RGLD
Materials industry group
65.85%
- Max
- 66.70%
- RGLD
- 65.85%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ALB | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.05% | 15.03% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.95% | 9.97% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 47.99% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.74% | 65.85% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.17% | 86.63% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 43.24% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Royal Gold (RGLD) reports EPS growth of 32.74%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ALB | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.37% | 43.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.10% | 19.54% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 32.74% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 22.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 and Royal Gold (RGLD) at 2.40 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
RGLD
Materials industry group
2.40
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- RGLD
- 2.40
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Royal Gold (RGLD) at 0.02 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 0.18 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
RGLD
Materials industry group
0.02
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- RGLD
- 0.02
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ALB | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 2.40 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.18 | 0.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | -0.03 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.65% and Royal Gold (RGLD) at 0.74% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RGLD
Materials industry group
0.74%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- RGLD
- 0.74%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 39.16% and Royal Gold (RGLD) at 19.41% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
RGLD
Materials industry group
19.41%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- RGLD
- 19.41%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ALB | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.65% | 0.74% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.16% | 19.41% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 and Royal Gold (RGLD) at 27.15 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
RGLD
Materials industry group
27.15
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- RGLD
- 27.15
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Royal Gold (RGLD) at 12.86 clears its benchmark range — RGLD looks notably rich on sales.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
RGLD
Materials industry group
12.86
- RGLD
- 12.86
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 and Royal Gold (RGLD) at 2.91 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
RGLD
Materials industry group
2.91
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- RGLD
- 2.91
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ALB | RGLD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.92 | 27.15 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 12.86 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 2.91 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.67% | 4.24% |