ALB vs. PAAS: Albemarle vs. Pan American Silver Stock Comparison
How do Albemarle (ALB) and Pan American Silver (PAAS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Albemarle (ALB) and Pan American Silver (PAAS) both fall under the Materials industry group, but ALB is classified in Chemicals while PAAS is classified in Metals & Mining.
| Profile Item | ALB | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Albemarle Corporation | Pan American Silver Corp. |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Silver |
| Market Capitalization | 11.71 billion USD | 16.98 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 22, 1994 | June 12, 1995 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ALB | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.28% | 22.43% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.80% | 47.84% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.74% | 11.59% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ALB | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 53.59% | 58.13% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.72 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -83.90% | -57.39% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.40M | 4.31M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ALB | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | 0.31 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.08 | 0.45 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 22.39% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 7.05% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PAAS.
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
PAAS
Materials industry group
22.39%
- Max
- 52.88%
- PAAS
- 22.39%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 35.16% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
PAAS
Materials industry group
35.16%
- Max
- 38.66%
- PAAS
- 35.16%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 34.29% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
PAAS
Materials industry group
34.29%
- Max
- 66.70%
- PAAS
- 34.29%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ALB | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.05% | 22.39% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.95% | 11.27% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 35.16% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.74% | 34.29% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.17% | 55.17% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 28.38% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Pan American Silver (PAAS) reports EPS growth of 725.81%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ALB | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.37% | 28.38% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.10% | 34.28% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 725.81% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 and Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 2.72 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
PAAS
Materials industry group
2.72
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- PAAS
- 2.72
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 0.11 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 0.18 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
PAAS
Materials industry group
0.11
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- PAAS
- 0.11
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ALB | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 2.72 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.18 | 0.11 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | -0.39 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.65% and Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 1.69% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PAAS
Materials industry group
1.69%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- PAAS
- 1.69%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 39.16% and Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 18.00% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PAAS
Materials industry group
18.00%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- PAAS
- 18.00%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ALB | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.65% | 1.69% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.16% | 18.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 10.83 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for PAAS, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
PAAS
Materials industry group
10.83
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- PAAS
- 10.83
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 and Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 3.80 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
PAAS
Materials industry group
3.80
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- PAAS
- 3.80
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 and Pan American Silver (PAAS) at 2.29 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
PAAS
Materials industry group
2.29
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- PAAS
- 2.29
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ALB | PAAS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.92 | 10.83 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 3.80 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 2.29 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.67% | 8.01% |