ALB vs. NEM: Albemarle vs. Newmont Stock Comparison
How do Albemarle (ALB) and Newmont (NEM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Albemarle (ALB) and Newmont (NEM) both fall under the Materials industry group, but ALB is classified in Chemicals while NEM is classified in Metals & Mining.
| Profile Item | ALB | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Albemarle Corporation | Newmont Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Gold |
| Market Capitalization | 11.71 billion USD | 125.65 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 22, 1994 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ALB | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.28% | 51.53% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.80% | 57.50% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.74% | 20.41% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Albemarle (ALB) has an aggressive beta of 1.32, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Newmont (NEM) is defensive at 0.51 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | ALB | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 53.59% | 48.55% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.51 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -83.90% | -62.40% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.40M | 6.95M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ALB | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | 0.97 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.08 | 1.41 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Newmont (NEM) at 27.26% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 7.05% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for NEM.
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
NEM
Materials industry group
27.26%
- Max
- 52.88%
- NEM
- 27.26%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Newmont (NEM) at 34.73% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
NEM
Materials industry group
34.73%
- Max
- 38.66%
- NEM
- 34.73%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Newmont (NEM) at 49.99% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
NEM
Materials industry group
49.99%
- Max
- 66.70%
- NEM
- 49.99%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ALB | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.05% | 27.26% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.95% | 16.37% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 34.73% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.74% | 49.99% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.17% | 68.04% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Newmont (NEM) at 21.34% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Newmont (NEM) reports EPS growth of 118.84%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ALB | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.37% | 21.34% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.10% | 23.91% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 118.84% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 and Newmont (NEM) at 2.45 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
NEM
Materials industry group
2.45
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- NEM
- 2.45
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 0.18 and Newmont (NEM) at 0.16 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
NEM
Materials industry group
0.16
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- NEM
- 0.16
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ALB | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 2.45 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.18 | 0.16 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | -0.18 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.65% and Newmont (NEM) at 0.87% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NEM
Materials industry group
0.87%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- NEM
- 0.87%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 39.16% and Newmont (NEM) at 11.95% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NEM
Materials industry group
11.95%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- NEM
- 11.95%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ALB | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.65% | 0.87% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.16% | 11.95% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 and Newmont (NEM) at 14.03 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
NEM
Materials industry group
14.03
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- NEM
- 14.03
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Newmont (NEM) at 4.72 sits in the pricier quartile — NEM costs more per dollar of sales.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
NEM
Materials industry group
4.72
- Max
- 9.62
- NEM
- 4.72
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 and Newmont (NEM) at 3.53 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
NEM
Materials industry group
3.53
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- NEM
- 3.53
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ALB | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.92 | 14.03 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 4.72 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 3.53 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.67% | 7.29% |