ALB vs. NEM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on July 7, 2025

Here’s a clear look at ALB and NEM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

NEM’s market capitalization of 66.67 billion USD is significantly greater than ALB’s 7.91 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

ALB’s beta of 1.61 points to significantly higher volatility compared to NEM (beta: 0.32), suggesting ALB has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

Symbol	ALB	NEM
Company Name	Albemarle Corporation	Newmont Corporation
Country	US	US
Sector	Basic Materials	Basic Materials
Industry	Chemicals - Specialty	Gold
CEO	Jerry Kent Masters Jr.	Thomas Ronald Palmer
Price	67.21 USD	59.9 USD
Market Cap	7.91 billion USD	66.67 billion USD
Beta	1.61	0.32
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
IPO Date	February 22, 1994	March 17, 1980
ADR	No	No

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ALB and NEM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ALB vs. NEM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ALB

-11.01%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max: 34.45%
Q3: 15.78%
Median: 7.65%
Q1: 2.96%
Min: -12.04%

ALB has a negative Return on Equity of -11.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NEM

16.86%

Gold Industry

Max: 25.86%
Q3: 12.48%
Median: 8.15%
Q1: 2.34%
Min: -3.82%

In the upper quartile for the Gold industry, NEM’s Return on Equity of 16.86% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Gold industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ALB

-8.62%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max: 20.22%
Q3: 10.99%
Median: 5.25%
Q1: 3.06%
Min: -8.62%

ALB has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -8.62%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

NEM

10.00%

Gold Industry

Max: 20.84%
Q3: 9.90%
Median: 5.11%
Q1: 1.36%
Min: -10.62%

In the upper quartile for the Gold industry, NEM’s Return on Invested Capital of 10.00% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Gold industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ALB

-22.39%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max: 23.23%
Q3: 10.64%
Median: 5.14%
Q1: 0.64%
Min: -8.93%

ALB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -22.39%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NEM

25.80%

Gold Industry

Max: 26.48%
Q3: 21.01%
Median: 16.48%
Q1: 8.22%
Min: -6.63%

A Net Profit Margin of 25.80% places NEM in the upper quartile for the Gold industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Gold industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ALB

-25.05%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max: 26.42%
Q3: 15.81%
Median: 10.07%
Q1: 4.82%
Min: -7.44%

ALB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -25.05%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

NEM

34.99%

Gold Industry

Max: 67.43%
Q3: 40.39%
Median: 30.64%
Q1: 19.83%
Min: -9.84%

NEM’s Operating Profit Margin of 34.99% is around the midpoint for the Gold industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Gold industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	ALB	NEM
Return on Equity (TTM)	-11.01%	16.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-6.71%	9.13%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)	-8.62%	10.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-22.39%	25.80%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	-25.05%	34.99%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	3.53%	39.32%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ALB

2.11

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max: 3.95
Q3: 2.60
Median: 2.04
Q1: 1.60
Min: 0.77

ALB’s Current Ratio of 2.11 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals - Specialty industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NEM

1.98

Gold Industry

Max: 4.98
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.34
Q1: 1.51
Min: 0.52

NEM’s Current Ratio of 1.98 aligns with the median group of the Gold industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Gold industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ALB

0.36

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max: 1.65
Q3: 1.10
Median: 0.73
Q1: 0.55
Min: 0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, ALB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

NEM

0.26

Gold Industry

Max: 0.67
Q3: 0.34
Median: 0.17
Q1: 0.06
Min: 0.00

NEM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.26 is typical for the Gold industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Gold industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ALB

-9.99

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max: 13.69
Q3: 9.06
Median: 5.24
Q1: 1.68
Min: -3.09

ALB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -9.99. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NEM

19.04

Gold Industry

Max: 45.23
Q3: 25.79
Median: 13.44
Q1: 2.91
Min: -6.26

NEM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Gold industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Gold industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	ALB	NEM
Current Ratio (TTM)	2.11	1.98
Quick Ratio (TTM)	1.26	1.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)	0.36	0.26
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)	0.21	0.14
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)	-2.61	0.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	-9.99	19.04

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ALB and NEM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ALB

2.41%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max: 9.19%
Q3: 2.44%
Median: 1.46%
Q1: 0.25%
Min: 0.00%

ALB’s Dividend Yield of 2.41% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals - Specialty industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NEM

1.67%

Gold Industry

Max: 3.65%
Q3: 1.37%
Median: 0.47%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.67%, NEM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Gold industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Gold industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ALB

-31.01%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max: 163.70%
Q3: 57.04%
Median: 30.02%
Q1: 12.51%
Min: 0.00%

ALB has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -31.01%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

NEM

22.47%

Gold Industry

Max: 110.70%
Q3: 42.09%
Median: 15.45%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NEM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.47% is within the typical range for the Gold industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Gold industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	ALB	NEM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.41%	1.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	-31.01%	22.47%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ALB

-6.93

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max: 56.68
Q3: 33.75
Median: 23.45
Q1: 16.09
Min: 7.50

ALB has a negative P/E Ratio of -6.93. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

NEM

13.31

Gold Industry

Max: 64.00
Q3: 46.06
Median: 29.03
Q1: 16.74
Min: 1.00

In the lower quartile for the Gold industry, NEM’s P/E Ratio of 13.31 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Gold industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ALB

37.21

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max: 6.58
Q3: 3.23
Median: 1.64
Q1: 0.96
Min: 0.16

ALB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 37.21 is exceptionally high for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

NEM

-0.79

Gold Industry

Max: 14.01
Q3: 6.52
Median: 3.33
Q1: 0.82
Min: 0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Gold industry.

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Gold industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ALB

1.55

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 2.31
Median: 1.38
Q1: 0.89
Min: 0.16

ALB’s P/S Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NEM

3.39

Gold Industry

Max: 15.12
Q3: 7.63
Median: 3.25
Q1: 2.30
Min: 0.79

NEM’s P/S Ratio of 3.39 aligns with the market consensus for the Gold industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Gold industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ALB

0.79

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max: 6.73
Q3: 3.78
Median: 1.56
Q1: 1.27
Min: 0.35

ALB’s P/B Ratio of 0.79 is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

NEM

2.16

Gold Industry

Max: 6.10
Q3: 3.60
Median: 2.02
Q1: 1.35
Min: 0.26

NEM’s P/B Ratio of 2.16 is within the conventional range for the Gold industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ALB vs. NEM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Gold industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	ALB	NEM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)	-6.93	13.31
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)	37.21	-0.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)	1.55	3.39
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)	0.79	2.16
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)	-56.65	15.85
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)	-12.35	7.15
EV-to-Sales (TTM)	1.97	3.56