ALB vs. IFF: Albemarle vs. Intl Flavors & Fragrances Stock Comparison
How do Albemarle (ALB) and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Albemarle (ALB) and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) are both classified in the Specialty Chemicals sub-industry within the broader Chemicals industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | ALB | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Albemarle Corporation | International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 11.71 billion USD | 20.69 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 22, 1994 | December 17, 1974 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.28% | 40.13% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.80% | 8.28% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.74% | -8.71% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 53.59% | 36.26% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.88 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -83.90% | -56.66% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.40M | 1.88M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | 0.99 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.08 | 1.71 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) reports a negative ROE of -7.37%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Albemarle (ALB) reports 7.05%, ranking against industry peers normally.
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
IFF
Materials industry group
-7.37%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- IFF
- -7.37%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08% and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 1.68% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
IFF
Materials industry group
1.68%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- IFF
- 1.68%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74% and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 9.53% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
IFF
Materials industry group
9.53%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- IFF
- 9.53%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.05% | -7.37% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.95% | 2.18% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 1.68% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.74% | 9.53% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.17% | 36.27% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at -5.17% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) reports EPS growth of -248.42%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.37% | -5.17% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.10% | -4.34% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -248.42% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 1.87 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
IFF
Materials industry group
1.87
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- IFF
- 1.87
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 0.18 and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 0.51 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
IFF
Materials industry group
0.51
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- IFF
- 0.51
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 1.87 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.18 | 0.51 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | 3.51 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 1.85% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Albemarle (ALB) at 1.65% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, IFF the richer one.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IFF
Materials industry group
1.85%
- Max
- 4.52%
- IFF
- 1.85%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Albemarle (ALB) at 39.16% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 62.26% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IFF
Materials industry group
62.26%
- Max
- 83.62%
- IFF
- 62.26%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.65% | 1.85% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.16% | 62.26% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 236.06 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for IFF’s trailing earnings.
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
IFF
Materials industry group
236.06
- IFF
- 236.06
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 1.91 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
IFF
Materials industry group
1.91
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- IFF
- 1.91
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 1.56 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
IFF
Materials industry group
1.56
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- IFF
- 1.56
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ALB | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.92 | 236.06 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 1.91 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 1.56 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.67% | -10.66% |