ALB vs. FNV: Albemarle vs. Franco-Nevada Stock Comparison
How do Albemarle (ALB) and Franco-Nevada (FNV) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Albemarle (ALB) and Franco-Nevada (FNV) both fall under the Materials industry group, but ALB is classified in Chemicals while FNV is classified in Metals & Mining.
| Profile Item | ALB | FNV |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Albemarle Corporation | Franco-Nevada Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Gold |
| Market Capitalization | 11.71 billion USD | 49.17 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 22, 1994 | December 7, 2007 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ALB | FNV |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.28% | 37.48% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.80% | 30.93% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.74% | 13.51% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Albemarle (ALB) has an aggressive beta of 1.32, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Franco-Nevada (FNV) is defensive at 0.28 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | ALB | FNV |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 53.59% | 39.71% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.28 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -83.90% | -37.12% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.40M | 716.56K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ALB | FNV |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | 0.84 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.08 | 1.19 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Franco-Nevada (FNV) at 19.91% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 7.05% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FNV.
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
FNV
Materials industry group
19.91%
- Max
- 52.88%
- FNV
- 19.91%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Franco-Nevada (FNV) at 64.23% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
FNV
Materials industry group
64.23%
- FNV
- 64.23%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Franco-Nevada (FNV) at 76.98% turns sales into operating profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74% operates around its industry’s norm.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
FNV
Materials industry group
76.98%
- FNV
- 76.98%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ALB | FNV |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.05% | 19.91% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.95% | 13.74% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 64.23% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.74% | 76.98% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.17% | 92.09% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Franco-Nevada (FNV) at 63.69% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Franco-Nevada (FNV) reports EPS growth of 100.70%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ALB | FNV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.37% | 63.69% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.10% | 11.48% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 100.70% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 16.42% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Franco-Nevada (FNV) at 9.38 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
FNV
Materials industry group
9.38
- FNV
- 9.38
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Albemarle (ALB) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.18 against its industry range, while Franco-Nevada (FNV) reports no figure this period.
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
FNV
Materials industry group
--
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
- FNV
- --
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ALB | FNV |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 9.38 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.18 | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | -0.49 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.65% and Franco-Nevada (FNV) at 0.65% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FNV
Materials industry group
0.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- FNV
- 0.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 39.16% and Franco-Nevada (FNV) at 21.44% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FNV
Materials industry group
21.44%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- FNV
- 21.44%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ALB | FNV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.65% | 0.65% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.16% | 21.44% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Franco-Nevada (FNV) at 33.33 sits in the richer quartile — FNV needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
FNV
Materials industry group
33.33
- Max
- 59.00
- FNV
- 33.33
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Franco-Nevada (FNV) at 21.37 clears its benchmark range — FNV looks notably rich on sales.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
FNV
Materials industry group
21.37
- FNV
- 21.37
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Franco-Nevada (FNV) at 5.97 carries an above-peer premium to book — FNV is pricier on assets.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
FNV
Materials industry group
5.97
- Max
- 6.59
- FNV
- 5.97
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ALB | FNV |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.92 | 33.33 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 21.37 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 5.97 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.67% | 0.96% |