ALB vs. ECL: Albemarle vs. Ecolab Stock Comparison
How do Albemarle (ALB) and Ecolab (ECL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Albemarle (ALB) and Ecolab (ECL) are both classified in the Specialty Chemicals sub-industry within the broader Chemicals industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | ALB | ECL |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Albemarle Corporation | Ecolab Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 11.71 billion USD | 84.33 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 22, 1994 | February 21, 1973 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ALB | ECL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.28% | 20.33% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.80% | 21.41% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.74% | 6.90% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ALB | ECL |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 53.59% | 21.72% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.84 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -83.90% | -43.70% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.40M | 1.40M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ALB | ECL |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | 0.74 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.08 | 1.13 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Ecolab (ECL) at 20.77% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 7.05% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for ECL.
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
ECL
Materials industry group
20.77%
- Max
- 52.88%
- ECL
- 20.77%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08% and Ecolab (ECL) at 11.99% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
ECL
Materials industry group
11.99%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ECL
- 11.99%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74% and Ecolab (ECL) at 19.22% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
ECL
Materials industry group
19.22%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- ECL
- 19.22%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ALB | ECL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.05% | 20.77% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.95% | 7.29% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 11.99% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.74% | 19.22% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.17% | 44.04% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Ecolab (ECL) at 2.16% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Ecolab (ECL) reports EPS growth of -1.22%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ALB | ECL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.37% | 2.16% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.10% | 4.26% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -1.22% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 24.09% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ecolab (ECL) at 1.11 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for ECL.
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
ECL
Materials industry group
1.11
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- ECL
- 1.11
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 0.18 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Ecolab (ECL) at 1.33 uses more debt funding than most peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
ECL
Materials industry group
1.33
- Max
- 1.98
- ECL
- 1.33
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ALB | ECL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 1.11 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.18 | 1.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | 3.09 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.65% and Ecolab (ECL) at 0.95% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ECL
Materials industry group
0.95%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ECL
- 0.95%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 39.16% and Ecolab (ECL) at 39.73% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ECL
Materials industry group
39.73%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ECL
- 39.73%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ALB | ECL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.65% | 0.95% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.16% | 39.73% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Ecolab (ECL) at 40.91 sits in the richer quartile — ECL needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
ECL
Materials industry group
40.91
- Max
- 59.00
- ECL
- 40.91
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ecolab (ECL) at 4.85 sits in the pricier quartile — ECL costs more per dollar of sales.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
ECL
Materials industry group
4.85
- Max
- 9.62
- ECL
- 4.85
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Ecolab (ECL) at 8.09 prices above its benchmark range — ECL looks rich relative to book.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
ECL
Materials industry group
8.09
- ECL
- 8.09
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ALB | ECL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.92 | 40.91 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 4.85 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 8.09 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.67% | 1.71% |