ALB vs. DOW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALB and DOW, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
DOW stands out with 20.32 billion USD in market value—about 3.06× ALB’s market cap of 6.64 billion USD.
ALB’s beta of 1.71 points to much larger expected swings compared to DOW’s calmer 0.94, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | ALB | DOW |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Albemarle Corporation | Dow Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals |
| CEO | Mr. Jerry Kent Masters Jr. | Mr. James R. Fitterling |
| Price | 56.44 USD | 28.75 USD |
| Market Cap | 6.64 billion USD | 20.32 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.71 | 0.94 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | February 22, 1994 | March 20, 2019 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALB and DOW over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALB and DOW based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALB posts a negative P/E of -5.82, reflecting last year’s net loss, while DOW at 70.08 signals healthy earnings.
- ALB and DOW both consumed more free cash flow than they generated last year—P/FCF of -47.57 and -41.06, respectively—highlighting persistent liquidity pressure.
| Symbol | ALB | DOW |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -5.82 | 70.08 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 31.25 | 0.72 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1.30 | 0.48 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 0.66 | 1.21 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -47.57 | -41.06 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -10.79 | 8.15 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1.72 | 0.86 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -62.77 | -74.30 |
Dividend Comparison
DOW stands out with a 9.74% dividend yield—around 240% above ALB’s 2.86%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | ALB | DOW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | 9.74% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALB and DOW, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With negative EBIT (-9.99), ALB cannot cover its interest payments. DOW, with an interest coverage of 1.67, meets its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ALB | DOW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.11 | 1.54 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.26 | 0.90 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.36 | 1.07 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.31 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -9.99 | 1.67 |