Seek Returns logo

ALB vs. CLF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ALB and CLF, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ALB’s market capitalization of 7.91 billion USD is substantially larger than CLF’s 4.36 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.61 for ALB and 1.85 for CLF, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolALBCLF
Company NameAlbemarle CorporationCleveland-Cliffs Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorBasic MaterialsBasic Materials
IndustryChemicals - SpecialtySteel
CEOJerry Kent Masters Jr.C. Lourenco Goncalves
Price67.21 USD8.82 USD
Market Cap7.91 billion USD4.36 billion USD
Beta1.611.85
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateFebruary 22, 1994November 5, 1987
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ALB and CLF by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ALB vs. CLF: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ALB

-11.01%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
34.45%
Q3
15.78%
Median
7.65%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-12.04%

ALB has a negative Return on Equity of -11.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CLF

-17.59%

Steel Industry

Max
19.41%
Q3
6.56%
Median
1.54%
Q1
-3.03%
Min
-12.88%

CLF has a negative Return on Equity of -17.59%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ALB

-8.62%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
10.99%
Median
5.25%
Q1
3.06%
Min
-8.62%

ALB has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -8.62%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

CLF

-5.38%

Steel Industry

Max
8.44%
Q3
6.04%
Median
2.41%
Q1
-2.16%
Min
-5.38%

CLF has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -5.38%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ALB

-22.39%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
23.23%
Q3
10.64%
Median
5.14%
Q1
0.64%
Min
-8.93%

ALB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -22.39%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CLF

-6.35%

Steel Industry

Max
6.80%
Q3
4.40%
Median
0.88%
Q1
-2.05%
Min
-10.37%

CLF has a negative Net Profit Margin of -6.35%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ALB

-25.05%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
26.42%
Q3
15.81%
Median
10.07%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-7.44%

ALB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -25.05%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CLF

-6.75%

Steel Industry

Max
17.40%
Q3
7.61%
Median
4.75%
Q1
-0.70%
Min
-10.86%

CLF has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -6.75%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolALBCLF
Return on Equity (TTM)-11.01%-17.59%
Return on Assets (TTM)-6.71%-5.67%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-8.62%-5.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-22.39%-6.35%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-25.05%-6.75%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)3.53%-3.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ALB

2.11

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
3.95
Q3
2.60
Median
2.04
Q1
1.60
Min
0.77

ALB’s Current Ratio of 2.11 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals - Specialty industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CLF

2.13

Steel Industry

Max
3.17
Q3
3.03
Median
2.58
Q1
1.87
Min
1.35

CLF’s Current Ratio of 2.13 aligns with the median group of the Steel industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ALB

0.36

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
1.10
Median
0.73
Q1
0.55
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, ALB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CLF

1.22

Steel Industry

Max
0.48
Q3
0.45
Median
0.27
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.22, CLF operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Steel industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ALB

-9.99

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
13.69
Q3
9.06
Median
5.24
Q1
1.68
Min
-3.09

ALB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -9.99. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CLF

-2.82

Steel Industry

Max
28.82
Q3
10.16
Median
3.04
Q1
-2.82
Min
-8.78

CLF has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -2.82. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolALBCLF
Current Ratio (TTM)2.112.13
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.260.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.361.22
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.210.36
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-2.61-119.75
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-9.99-2.82

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ALB and CLF. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ALB

2.41%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
9.19%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.46%
Q1
0.25%
Min
0.00%

ALB’s Dividend Yield of 2.41% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals - Specialty industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CLF

0.00%

Steel Industry

Max
16.89%
Q3
3.75%
Median
1.68%
Q1
1.43%
Min
0.00%

CLF currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ALB

-31.01%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
163.70%
Q3
57.04%
Median
30.02%
Q1
12.51%
Min
0.00%

ALB has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -31.01%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

CLF

0.00%

Steel Industry

Max
222.70%
Q3
39.78%
Median
32.33%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLF has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolALBCLF
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.41%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)-31.01%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ALB

-6.93

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
56.68
Q3
33.75
Median
23.45
Q1
16.09
Min
7.50

ALB has a negative P/E Ratio of -6.93. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

CLF

-3.69

Steel Industry

Max
24.65
Q3
23.86
Median
21.78
Q1
15.59
Min
7.61

CLF has a negative P/E Ratio of -3.69. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ALB

37.21

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
3.23
Median
1.64
Q1
0.96
Min
0.16

ALB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 37.21 is exceptionally high for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

CLF

0.12

Steel Industry

Max
3.14
Q3
2.43
Median
0.99
Q1
0.40
Min
0.10

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Steel industry.

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ALB

1.55

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
2.31
Median
1.38
Q1
0.89
Min
0.16

ALB’s P/S Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLF

0.23

Steel Industry

Max
1.22
Q3
0.82
Median
0.47
Q1
0.30
Min
0.19

In the lower quartile for the Steel industry, CLF’s P/S Ratio of 0.23 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ALB

0.79

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
6.73
Q3
3.78
Median
1.56
Q1
1.27
Min
0.35

ALB’s P/B Ratio of 0.79 is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CLF

0.70

Steel Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.48
Median
0.77
Q1
0.59
Min
0.38

CLF’s P/B Ratio of 0.70 is within the conventional range for the Steel industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ALB vs. CLF: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Chemicals - Specialty and Steel industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolALBCLF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-6.93-3.69
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)37.210.12
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.550.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)0.790.70
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-56.65-4.14
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-12.35-189.00
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.970.64