ALB vs. CCK: Albemarle vs. Crown Holdings Stock Comparison
How do Albemarle (ALB) and Crown Holdings (CCK) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Albemarle (ALB) and Crown Holdings (CCK) both fall under the Materials industry group, but ALB is classified in Chemicals while CCK is classified in Containers & Packaging.
| Profile Item | ALB | CCK |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Albemarle Corporation | Crown Holdings Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Containers & Packaging |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Metal, Glass & Plastic Containers |
| Market Capitalization | 11.71 billion USD | 13.11 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 22, 1994 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ALB | CCK |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.28% | 28.01% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.80% | 17.05% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.74% | 4.17% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Albemarle (ALB) has an aggressive beta of 1.32, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Crown Holdings (CCK) is defensive at 0.53 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | ALB | CCK |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 53.59% | 25.51% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.53 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -83.90% | -48.28% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.40M | 877.28K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ALB | CCK |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | 0.93 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.08 | 1.46 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Crown Holdings (CCK) at 27.13% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 7.05% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CCK.
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
CCK
Materials industry group
27.13%
- Max
- 52.88%
- CCK
- 27.13%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08% and Crown Holdings (CCK) at 5.78% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
CCK
Materials industry group
5.78%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- CCK
- 5.78%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74% and Crown Holdings (CCK) at 11.96% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
CCK
Materials industry group
11.96%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- CCK
- 11.96%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ALB | CCK |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.05% | 27.13% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.95% | 7.05% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 5.78% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.74% | 11.96% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.17% | 20.18% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.78% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Crown Holdings (CCK) reports EPS growth of 79.72%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ALB | CCK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.37% | 4.78% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.10% | -1.51% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 79.72% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 2.12% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.14 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CCK.
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
CCK
Materials industry group
1.14
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- CCK
- 1.14
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 0.18 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.75 uses more debt funding than most peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
CCK
Materials industry group
1.75
- Max
- 1.98
- CCK
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ALB | CCK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 1.14 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.18 | 1.75 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | 2.57 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.65% and Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.08% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CCK
Materials industry group
1.08%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- CCK
- 1.08%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 39.16% and Crown Holdings (CCK) at 18.27% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CCK
Materials industry group
18.27%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- CCK
- 18.27%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ALB | CCK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.65% | 1.08% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.16% | 18.27% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 and Crown Holdings (CCK) at 16.92 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
CCK
Materials industry group
16.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- CCK
- 16.92
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 and Crown Holdings (CCK) at 0.95 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
CCK
Materials industry group
0.95
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- CCK
- 0.95
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.41 carries an above-peer premium to book — CCK is pricier on assets.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
CCK
Materials industry group
4.41
- Max
- 6.59
- CCK
- 4.41
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ALB | CCK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.92 | 16.92 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 0.95 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 4.41 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.67% | 5.53% |