ALB vs. BALL: Albemarle vs. Ball Stock Comparison
How do Albemarle (ALB) and Ball (BALL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Albemarle (ALB) and Ball (BALL) both fall under the Materials industry group, but ALB is classified in Chemicals while BALL is classified in Containers & Packaging.
| Profile Item | ALB | BALL |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Albemarle Corporation | Ball Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Containers & Packaging |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Metal, Glass & Plastic Containers |
| Market Capitalization | 11.71 billion USD | 17.16 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 22, 1994 | February 21, 1973 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ALB | BALL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.28% | 38.59% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.80% | 12.78% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.74% | -4.75% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ALB | BALL |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 53.59% | 27.54% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.94 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -83.90% | -54.87% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.40M | 2.12M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ALB | BALL |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | 1.25 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.08 | 2.02 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 7.05% and Ball (BALL) at 9.49% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
BALL
Materials industry group
9.49%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- BALL
- 9.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08% and Ball (BALL) at 3.52% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
BALL
Materials industry group
3.52%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- BALL
- 3.52%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74% and Ball (BALL) at 9.67% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
BALL
Materials industry group
9.67%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- BALL
- 9.67%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ALB | BALL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.05% | 9.49% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.95% | 4.65% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 3.52% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.74% | 9.67% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.17% | 17.84% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Ball (BALL) at 11.58% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Ball (BALL) reports EPS growth of -74.62%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ALB | BALL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.37% | 11.58% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.10% | -0.53% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -74.62% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 13.62% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ball (BALL) at 1.04 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for BALL.
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
BALL
Materials industry group
1.04
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- BALL
- 1.04
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 0.18 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Ball (BALL) at 1.33 uses more debt funding than most peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
BALL
Materials industry group
1.33
- Max
- 1.98
- BALL
- 1.33
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ALB | BALL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 1.04 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.18 | 1.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | 3.45 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.65% and Ball (BALL) at 1.20% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
BALL
Materials industry group
1.20%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- BALL
- 1.20%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 39.16% and Ball (BALL) at 40.20% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
BALL
Materials industry group
40.20%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- BALL
- 40.20%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ALB | BALL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.65% | 1.20% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.16% | 40.20% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Ball (BALL) at 33.13 sits in the richer quartile — BALL needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
BALL
Materials industry group
33.13
- Max
- 59.00
- BALL
- 33.13
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 and Ball (BALL) at 1.13 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
BALL
Materials industry group
1.13
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- BALL
- 1.13
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 and Ball (BALL) at 3.02 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
BALL
Materials industry group
3.02
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- BALL
- 3.02
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ALB | BALL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.92 | 33.13 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 1.13 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 3.02 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.67% | 1.54% |