ALB vs. B: Albemarle vs. Barrick Mining Stock Comparison
How do Albemarle (ALB) and Barrick Mining (B) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Albemarle (ALB) and Barrick Mining (B) both fall under the Materials industry group, but ALB is classified in Chemicals while B is classified in Metals & Mining.
| Profile Item | ALB | B |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Albemarle Corporation | Barrick Mining Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Gold |
| Market Capitalization | 11.71 billion USD | 66.76 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 22, 1994 | February 13, 1985 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ALB | B |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.28% | 30.63% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.80% | 43.54% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.74% | 19.79% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Albemarle (ALB) has an aggressive beta of 1.32, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Barrick Mining (B) is defensive at 0.48 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | ALB | B |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 53.59% | 47.11% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.48 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -83.90% | -47.62% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.40M | 9.08M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ALB | B |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | 0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.08 | 0.80 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Barrick Mining (B) at 27.01% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 7.05% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for B.
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
B
Materials industry group
27.01%
- Max
- 52.88%
- B
- 27.01%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Barrick Mining (B) at 31.60% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
B
Materials industry group
31.60%
- Max
- 38.66%
- B
- 31.60%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Barrick Mining (B) at 51.34% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
B
Materials industry group
51.34%
- Max
- 66.70%
- B
- 51.34%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ALB | B |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.05% | 27.01% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.95% | 13.44% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 31.60% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.74% | 51.34% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.17% | 56.27% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Barrick Mining (B) at 31.22% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Barrick Mining (B) reports EPS growth of 140.16%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ALB | B |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.37% | 31.22% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.10% | 15.47% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 140.16% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 130.26% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 and Barrick Mining (B) at 3.01 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
B
Materials industry group
3.01
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- B
- 3.01
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Barrick Mining (B) at 0.13 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 0.18 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
B
Materials industry group
0.13
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- B
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ALB | B |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 3.01 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.18 | 0.13 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | -0.10 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.65% and Barrick Mining (B) at 1.61% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
B
Materials industry group
1.61%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- B
- 1.61%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 39.16% and Barrick Mining (B) at 23.77% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
B
Materials industry group
23.77%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- B
- 23.77%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ALB | B |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.65% | 1.61% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.16% | 23.77% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Barrick Mining (B) at 10.48 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for B, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
B
Materials industry group
10.48
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- B
- 10.48
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 and Barrick Mining (B) at 3.23 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
B
Materials industry group
3.23
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- B
- 3.23
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 and Barrick Mining (B) at 2.44 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
B
Materials industry group
2.44
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- B
- 2.44
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ALB | B |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.92 | 10.48 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 3.23 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 2.44 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.67% | 7.62% |