ALB vs. AU: Albemarle vs. AngloGold Ashanti Stock Comparison
How do Albemarle (ALB) and AngloGold Ashanti (AU) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Albemarle (ALB) and AngloGold Ashanti (AU) both fall under the Materials industry group, but ALB is classified in Chemicals while AU is classified in Metals & Mining.
| Profile Item | ALB | AU |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Albemarle Corporation | AngloGold Ashanti plc |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Chemicals | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Specialty Chemicals | Gold |
| Market Capitalization | 11.71 billion USD | 47.04 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 22, 1994 | August 5, 1998 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ALB | AU |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 1.28% | 47.97% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -3.80% | 87.34% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -17.74% | 42.76% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Albemarle (ALB) has an aggressive beta of 1.32, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while AngloGold Ashanti (AU) is defensive at 0.67 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | ALB | AU |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 53.59% | 60.11% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.67 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -83.90% | -51.75% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.40M | 2.54M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ALB | AU |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | 0.73 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.08 | 1.07 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
AngloGold Ashanti (AU) at 44.33% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 7.05% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for AU.
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
AU
Materials industry group
44.33%
- Max
- 52.88%
- AU
- 44.33%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
AngloGold Ashanti (AU) at 32.64% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
AU
Materials industry group
32.64%
- Max
- 38.66%
- AU
- 32.64%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
AngloGold Ashanti (AU) at 45.36% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
AU
Materials industry group
45.36%
- Max
- 66.70%
- AU
- 45.36%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ALB | AU |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.05% | 44.33% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.95% | 24.39% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.08% | 32.64% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.74% | 45.36% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.17% | 54.84% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
AngloGold Ashanti (AU) at 70.78% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: AngloGold Ashanti (AU) reports EPS growth of 122.32%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ALB | AU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.37% | 70.78% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.10% | 30.02% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 122.32% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 93.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 and AngloGold Ashanti (AU) at 2.55 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
AU
Materials industry group
2.55
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- AU
- 2.55
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 0.18 and AngloGold Ashanti (AU) at 0.16 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
AU
Materials industry group
0.16
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- AU
- 0.16
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ALB | AU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.34 | 2.55 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.18 | 0.16 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.09 | -0.17 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Albemarle (ALB) at 1.65% pays an industry-typical yield; AngloGold Ashanti (AU) at 4.88% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
AU
Materials industry group
4.88%
- AU
- 4.88%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Albemarle (ALB) at 39.16% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while AngloGold Ashanti (AU) at 58.78% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
AU
Materials industry group
58.78%
- Max
- 83.62%
- AU
- 58.78%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ALB | AU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.65% | 4.88% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 39.16% | 58.78% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 and AngloGold Ashanti (AU) at 12.09 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
AU
Materials industry group
12.09
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- AU
- 12.09
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 and AngloGold Ashanti (AU) at 3.91 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
AU
Materials industry group
3.91
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- AU
- 3.91
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while AngloGold Ashanti (AU) at 5.01 carries an above-peer premium to book — AU is pricier on assets.
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
AU
Materials industry group
5.01
- Max
- 6.59
- AU
- 5.01
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ALB | AU |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.92 | 12.09 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.90 | 3.91 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 5.01 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.67% | 7.61% |