ALB vs. APD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALB and APD, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
APD towers over ALB with a market cap of 60.01 billion USD, roughly 9.04 times the 6.64 billion USD of its peer.
ALB rides a wilder wave with a beta of 1.71, hinting at bigger swings than APD’s steadier 0.89.
| Symbol | ALB | APD |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Albemarle Corporation | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty |
| CEO | Mr. Jerry Kent Masters Jr. | Mr. Eduardo F. Menezes |
| Price | 56.44 USD | 269.67 USD |
| Market Cap | 6.64 billion USD | 60.01 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.714 | 0.89 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | February 22, 1994 | March 17, 1980 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALB and APD over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALB and APD based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALB has a negative P/E of -5.82, indicating it’s been unprofitable over the past year with no net earnings to support its stock price. On the other hand, APD at 39.17 has maintained positive earnings, showing a healthier profit profile.
- Both ALB at -47.57 and APD at -13.85 have negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow values. This reveals they’ve been consuming more cash than they generate over the past year—a persistent cash drain that could strain their ability to operate without external funding.
| Symbol | ALB | APD |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -5.82 | 39.17 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 31.25 | 5.00 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1.30 | 4.99 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 0.66 | 4.08 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -47.57 | -13.85 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -10.79 | 22.15 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1.72 | 6.24 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -62.77 | -17.31 |
Dividend Comparison
Both ALB at 2.86% and APD at 2.63% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Their yields align closely, indicating similar income-growth balances.
| Symbol | ALB | APD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | 2.63% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALB and APD, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- APD’s current ratio of 1.00 dips below 1, leaving short-term liabilities larger than current assets—a scenario that could hinge on cash flow support. On the other hand, ALB at 2.11 has enough assets to handle its obligations.
- ALB clocks in at -9.99 below 1.5, earnings just keeping ahead of interest—dicey if profits stumble. By contrast, APD’s 7.66 sails through with plenty of cushion.
| Symbol | ALB | APD |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.11 | 1.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.26 | 0.85 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.36 | 1.12 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.42 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -9.99 | 7.66 |