ALAB vs. CRDO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ALAB and CRDO, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With ALAB at 15.20 billion USD and CRDO at 10.26 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
CRDO carries a higher beta at 2.29, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ALAB remains steadier at 0.33.
| Symbol | ALAB | CRDO |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment |
| CEO | Mr. Jitendra Mohan | Mr. William J. Brennan |
| Price | 92.17 USD | 60.45 USD |
| Market Cap | 15.20 billion USD | 10.26 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.33 | 2.29 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 20, 2024 | January 27, 2022 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ALAB and CRDO over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ALAB and CRDO based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALAB and CRDO both trade above a 100× earnings multiple (363.38 and 1986.26), reflecting lofty growth narratives priced into their shares.
- CRDO reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -424.45, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ALAB at 140.53 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | ALAB | CRDO |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 363.38 | 1986.26 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 10.90 | 74.87 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 30.99 | 31.34 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.44 | 16.44 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 140.53 | -424.45 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -832.77 | 1084.70 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 30.81 | 30.47 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 139.73 | -412.74 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ALAB nor CRDO currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ALAB | CRDO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ALAB and CRDO, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- Neither ALAB nor CRDO records interest coverage (both “--”), indicating virtually no interest expense—usually a sign of negligible debt.
| Symbol | ALAB | CRDO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 13.92 | 7.67 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 13.26 | 7.01 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |