AGNC vs. VTR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

VTR stands out with 28.71 billion USD in market value—about 3.20× AGNC’s market cap of 8.98 billion USD.

With betas of 1.30 for AGNC and 0.97 for VTR, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AGNC and VTR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AGNC and VTR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• VTR features a high P/E of 293.18, indicating strong growth expectations, compared to AGNC at 17.19, which trades at a more standard valuation based on its current earnings.
• Analysts assign negative forward PEG ratios to both AGNC (-6.57) and VTR (-2.93), suggesting expectation of shrinking or negative earnings in the upcoming period—a worrying sign for their profit outlook.

Dividend Comparison

AGNC’s dividend yield of 16.36% is about 469% higher than VTR’s 2.88%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AGNC and VTR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• With current ratios of 0.00 and 0.00, both AGNC and VTR have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
• Both AGNC (quick ratio 0.00) and VTR (quick ratio 0.00) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
• AGNC is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 8.30), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while VTR at 0.00 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
• AGNC’s debt-to-assets ratio of 0.87 indicates it relies heavily on debt to back its assets—potentially risky in a downturn—whereas VTR at 0.00 keeps borrowing to a more moderate level.