AFRM vs. INTC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFRM and INTC, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
INTC towers over AFRM with a market cap of 90.25 billion USD, roughly 5.92 times the 15.24 billion USD of its peer.
AFRM rides a wilder wave with a beta of 3.66, hinting at bigger swings than INTC’s steadier 1.14.
| Symbol | AFRM | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Affirm Holdings, Inc. | Intel Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Max Roth Levchin | Mr. Lip-Bu Tan |
| Price | 47.24 USD | 20.69 USD |
| Market Cap | 15.24 billion USD | 90.25 billion USD |
| Beta | 3.664 | 1.144 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | January 13, 2021 | March 17, 1980 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFRM and INTC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AFRM and INTC based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Both AFRM at -246.14 and INTC at -4.68 have negative P/E values over the past twelve months. This reflects consistent losses rather than profits, meaning their current operations aren’t generating positive net income—a situation that could challenge their financial stability if prolonged.
- Both AFRM at -1.38 and INTC at -0.05 show negative Forward PEG values. This signals that analysts foresee either outright losses or a decline in earnings over the next period—a troubling outlook that casts doubt on their near-term profit potential.
- INTC has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -7.03, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, AFRM at 25.04 maintains a positive cash position.
| Symbol | AFRM | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -246.14 | -4.68 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.38 | -0.05 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.07 | 1.70 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.32 | 0.90 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 25.04 | -7.03 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 69.85 | 87.64 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.07 | 2.48 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 34.90 | -10.24 |
Dividend Comparison
AFRM pays no dividends, focusing all profits on growth, appealing to capital-gains investors. Meanwhile, INTC’s 0.60% yield rewards shareholders, showing financial confidence while supporting objectives—a contrast to AFRM’s growth-only approach.
| Symbol | AFRM | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.60% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFRM and INTC, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AFRM at -0.24 and INTC at -9.98 both scrape by with interest coverage under 1.5. Earnings are stretched thin against interest bills, leaving little wiggle room if profits drop.
| Symbol | AFRM | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 1.31 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 0.93 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.56 | 0.50 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.71 | 0.26 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -0.24 | -9.98 |