Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. GFS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and GFS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAFRMGFS
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.GlobalFoundries Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization24.70 billion USD19.95 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 13, 2021October 28, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and GFS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. GFS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFRMGFS
5-Day Price Return3.80%0.28%
13-Week Price Return6.50%-7.73%
26-Week Price Return66.69%-0.11%
52-Week Price Return97.04%-7.73%
Month-to-Date Return3.80%0.28%
Year-to-Date Return24.56%-16.24%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.22M4.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.88M2.47M
3-Month Volatility62.15%41.48%
Beta3.641.52

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFRM

1.80%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

AFRM’s Return on Equity of 1.80% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

GFS

-1.03%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

GFS has a negative Return on Equity of -1.03%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AFRM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

1.62%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, AFRM’s Net Profit Margin of 1.62% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

GFS

-1.68%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

GFS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.68%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AFRM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

-0.29%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.29%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GFS

-2.47%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

GFS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.47%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AFRM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMGFS
Return on Equity (TTM)1.80%-1.03%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.49%-0.67%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.62%-1.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.29%-2.47%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)92.49%23.76%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

4.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

GFS

2.63

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

GFS’s Current Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AFRM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

2.48

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

GFS

0.15

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

GFS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AFRM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

-3.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

GFS

29.37

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

GFS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 29.37 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AFRM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMGFS
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.202.63
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.201.92
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.480.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.7629.37

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. GFS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFRM vs. GFS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AFRM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AFRM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMGFS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

473.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

At 473.02, AFRM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GFS

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

P/E Ratio data for GFS is currently unavailable.

AFRM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

7.66

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

GFS

2.90

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

GFS’s P/S Ratio of 2.90 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AFRM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

7.27

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

AFRM’s P/B Ratio of 7.27 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GFS

1.86

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

GFS’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AFRM vs. GFS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMGFS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)473.02--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.662.90
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.271.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.0220.40