Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. CRM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and CRM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAFRMCRM
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Salesforce, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesSoftware
Market Capitalization22.71 billion USD229.51 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 13, 2021June 23, 2004
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and CRM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. CRM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFRMCRM
5-Day Price Return-7.33%0.81%
13-Week Price Return-10.43%0.50%
26-Week Price Return30.72%-15.74%
52-Week Price Return28.62%-28.70%
Month-to-Date Return-1.91%-6.43%
Year-to-Date Return15.78%-27.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.31M6.35M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.96M8.36M
3-Month Volatility67.46%32.37%
Beta3.621.29

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFRM

7.75%

Financial Services Industry

Max
34.42%
Q3
16.76%
Median
9.18%
Q1
3.90%
Min
-10.16%

AFRM’s Return on Equity of 7.75% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRM

11.03%

Software Industry

Max
65.88%
Q3
22.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
-6.54%
Min
-41.05%

CRM’s Return on Equity of 11.03% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. CRM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

6.74%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.33%
Median
13.11%
Q1
7.04%
Min
-8.99%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, AFRM’s Net Profit Margin of 6.74% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CRM

16.87%

Software Industry

Max
53.50%
Q3
20.30%
Median
9.60%
Q1
-4.98%
Min
-41.00%

CRM’s Net Profit Margin of 16.87% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. CRM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

4.96%

Financial Services Industry

Max
81.07%
Q3
40.32%
Median
19.93%
Q1
10.20%
Min
-34.40%

AFRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.96% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CRM

18.89%

Software Industry

Max
61.99%
Q3
23.67%
Median
10.93%
Q1
-3.57%
Min
-40.19%

CRM’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.89% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. CRM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMCRM
Return on Equity (TTM)7.75%11.03%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.14%6.82%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.74%16.87%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.96%18.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)92.50%77.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

4.58

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.26
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CRM

1.12

Software Industry

Max
4.01
Q3
2.27
Median
1.50
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

CRM’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AFRM vs. CRM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

2.35

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.55
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CRM

0.14

Software Industry

Max
2.04
Q3
0.86
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CRM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AFRM vs. CRM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

-3.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
140.54
Q3
57.67
Median
6.72
Q1
1.93
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CRM

19.86

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
33.82
Median
1.59
Q1
-10.48
Min
-71.23

CRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.86 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AFRM vs. CRM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMCRM
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.581.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.491.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.350.14
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.7619.86

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. CRM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFRM vs. CRM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.52%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.75%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRM

0.68%

Software Industry

Max
0.34%
Q3
0.17%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRM’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

AFRM vs. CRM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
17.51%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRM

23.50%

Software Industry

Max
12.76%
Q3
6.56%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 23.50%, CRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

AFRM vs. CRM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMCRM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.68%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%23.50%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

96.53

Financial Services Industry

Max
46.13
Q3
28.79
Median
13.18
Q1
9.14
Min
0.47

At 96.53, AFRM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CRM

34.81

Software Industry

Max
142.78
Q3
72.24
Median
36.21
Q1
24.24
Min
4.55

CRM’s P/E Ratio of 34.81 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. CRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

6.50

Financial Services Industry

Max
9.71
Q3
4.81
Median
2.49
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CRM

5.87

Software Industry

Max
20.79
Q3
12.71
Median
6.75
Q1
4.56
Min
0.87

CRM’s P/S Ratio of 5.87 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AFRM vs. CRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

7.21

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.21
Q3
3.51
Median
1.52
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

AFRM’s P/B Ratio of 7.21 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CRM

4.03

Software Industry

Max
30.49
Q3
14.84
Median
8.09
Q1
4.32
Min
0.38

CRM’s P/B Ratio of 4.03 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AFRM vs. CRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMCRM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)96.5334.81
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.505.87
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.214.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.2518.56