Seek Returns logo

AFRM vs. BR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFRM and BR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAFRMBR
Company NameAffirm Holdings, Inc.Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesProfessional Services
Market Capitalization24.37 billion USD27.39 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 13, 2021March 22, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFRM and BR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFRM vs. BR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAFRMBR
5-Day Price Return-2.26%-1.24%
13-Week Price Return8.15%-3.07%
26-Week Price Return65.59%-3.20%
52-Week Price Return91.63%9.80%
Month-to-Date Return2.39%-1.46%
Year-to-Date Return22.87%3.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.39M0.58M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.86M0.67M
3-Month Volatility62.14%21.35%
Beta3.641.02

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AFRM

1.80%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

AFRM’s Return on Equity of 1.80% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

BR

35.46%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

In the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, BR’s Return on Equity of 35.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AFRM vs. BR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

1.62%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, AFRM’s Net Profit Margin of 1.62% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BR

12.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

BR’s Net Profit Margin of 12.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. BR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AFRM

-0.29%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

AFRM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.29%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

BR

17.25%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

BR’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.25% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFRM vs. BR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFRMBR
Return on Equity (TTM)1.80%35.46%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.49%10.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.62%12.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.29%17.25%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)92.49%31.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

4.20

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BR

0.98

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

BR’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AFRM vs. BR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

2.48

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

BR

1.22

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

BR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.22 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AFRM vs. BR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

-3.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

BR

9.63

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

BR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.63 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AFRM vs. BR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFRMBR
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.200.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.200.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.481.22
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.769.63

Growth

Revenue Growth

AFRM vs. BR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AFRM vs. BR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BR

1.48%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

BR’s Dividend Yield of 1.48% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AFRM vs. BR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AFRM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BR

47.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

BR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 47.91% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AFRM vs. BR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFRMBR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%47.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

466.96

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

At 466.96, AFRM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BR

32.45

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

BR’s P/E Ratio of 32.45 is within the middle range for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AFRM vs. BR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AFRM

7.56

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

BR

3.96

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

BR’s P/S Ratio of 3.96 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AFRM vs. BR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AFRM

7.27

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

AFRM’s P/B Ratio of 7.27 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BR

10.75

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

BR’s P/B Ratio of 10.75 is in the upper tier for the Professional Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AFRM vs. BR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFRMBR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)466.9632.45
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.563.96
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.2710.75
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.5022.45