AFRM vs. ASTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFRM and ASTS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AFRM dominates in value with a market cap of 15.24 billion USD, eclipsing ASTS’s 7.81 billion USD by roughly 1.95×.
AFRM’s beta of 3.66 points to much larger expected swings compared to ASTS’s calmer 2.04, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AFRM | ASTS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Affirm Holdings, Inc. | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Communication Equipment |
| CEO | Mr. Max Roth Levchin | Mr. Abel Avellan |
| Price | 47.24 USD | 23.83 USD |
| Market Cap | 15.24 billion USD | 7.81 billion USD |
| Beta | 3.66 | 2.04 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | January 13, 2021 | November 1, 2019 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFRM and ASTS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AFRM and ASTS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Neither AFRM nor ASTS turned a profit—both carry negative P/E ratios of -246.14 and -16.37, underscoring continued losses that pressure their valuations.
- AFRM posts a negative forward PEG of -1.38, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas ASTS at 8.02 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
- ASTS reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -21.60, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AFRM at 25.04 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | AFRM | ASTS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -246.14 | -16.37 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.38 | 8.02 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.07 | 1684.97 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.32 | 6.96 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 25.04 | -21.60 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 69.85 | -15.01 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.07 | 1500.29 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 34.90 | -19.24 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AFRM nor ASTS currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | AFRM | ASTS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFRM and ASTS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With negative EBIT (-0.24), AFRM cannot cover its interest payments. ASTS, with an interest coverage of 39.54, meets its interest obligations.
| Symbol | AFRM | ASTS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 10.62 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 63.09 | 10.62 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 2.56 | 0.02 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.71 | 0.01 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -0.24 | 39.54 |