Seek Returns logo

AFL vs. MS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFL and MS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

MS’s market capitalization of 231.25 billion USD is significantly greater than AFL’s 56.54 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

MS carries a higher beta at 1.29, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AFL (beta: 0.81) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAFLMS
Company NameAflac IncorporatedMorgan Stanley
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - LifeFinancial - Capital Markets
CEODaniel Paul AmosEdward N. Pick
Price104.57 USD144.14 USD
Market Cap56.54 billion USD231.25 billion USD
Beta0.811.29
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980February 23, 1993
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFL and MS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFL vs. MS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFL

13.91%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
23.38%
Q3
14.56%
Median
11.23%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-5.23%

AFL’s Return on Equity of 13.91% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Life industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MS

14.01%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
42.02%
Q3
20.69%
Median
13.73%
Q1
3.33%
Min
-21.32%

MS’s Return on Equity of 14.01% is on par with the norm for the Financial - Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFL

2.99%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
6.30%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.16%
Q1
0.68%
Min
-0.10%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Life industry.

MS

2.64%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
30.24%
Q3
13.34%
Median
6.20%
Q1
-1.71%
Min
-16.91%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFL

21.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
21.20%
Q3
11.59%
Median
7.10%
Q1
3.79%
Min
2.14%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.03% places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MS

13.52%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
28.67%
Q3
13.52%
Median
10.47%
Q1
0.24%
Min
-9.55%

MS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.52% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFL

25.70%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
38.96%
Q3
37.28%
Median
14.06%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-1.68%

In the Insurance - Life industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

MS

17.73%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
56.86%
Q3
25.29%
Median
15.90%
Q1
0.51%
Min
-19.18%

MS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.73% is around the midpoint for the Financial - Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFLMS
Return on Equity (TTM)13.91%14.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%1.18%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)2.99%2.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.03%13.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.70%17.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.82%56.30%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFL

--

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
843.97
Q3
821.68
Median
6.06
Q1
3.15
Min
0.47

Current Ratio data for AFL is currently unavailable.

MS

0.66

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
4.60
Q3
3.24
Median
1.32
Q1
0.96
Min
0.05

For the Financial - Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFL

0.29

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
0.86
Q3
0.83
Median
0.55
Q1
0.37
Min
0.27

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, AFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MS

3.45

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.68
Median
0.37
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

MS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Financial - Capital Markets industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.45. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFL

21.96

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
37.82
Q3
19.50
Median
6.25
Q1
2.29
Min
-0.76

AFL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.96 is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MS

0.41

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
12.71
Q3
7.94
Median
1.92
Q1
0.24
Min
-7.71

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFLMS
Current Ratio (TTM)--0.66
Quick Ratio (TTM)--0.66
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.293.45
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.30
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.5711.97
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)21.950.41

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFL and MS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFL

2.07%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
10.36%
Q3
4.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.51%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Yield of 2.07% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance - Life industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MS

2.57%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
5.86%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.57%, MS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Financial - Capital Markets industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFL

31.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
203.94%
Q3
64.38%
Median
29.88%
Q1
19.14%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.03% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Life industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MS

42.94%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
128.06%
Q3
43.11%
Median
12.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 42.94% is within the typical range for the Financial - Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFLMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%2.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.03%42.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFL

15.85

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
17.82
Q3
16.08
Median
12.43
Q1
7.33
Min
3.69

AFL’s P/E Ratio of 15.85 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MS

15.97

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
42.65
Q3
29.09
Median
20.52
Q1
14.58
Min
8.28

MS’s P/E Ratio of 15.97 is within the middle range for the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFL

2.40

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.81
Q3
1.95
Median
0.97
Q1
0.53
Min
0.24

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.40 places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

MS

2.27

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
4.05
Q3
2.46
Median
1.52
Q1
0.78
Min
0.02

MS’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.27 is within the middle range of its peers in the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFL

3.31

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.84
Q3
2.89
Median
1.06
Q1
0.63
Min
0.31

AFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.31 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance - Life industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MS

2.19

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.34
Q3
7.63
Median
2.98
Q1
1.50
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFL

2.16

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.87
Q3
2.13
Median
1.49
Q1
0.95
Min
0.38

AFL’s P/B Ratio of 2.16 is in the upper tier for the Insurance - Life industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MS

2.18

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.60
Q3
6.00
Median
2.91
Q1
1.84
Min
0.53

MS’s P/B Ratio of 2.18 is within the conventional range for the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AFL vs. MS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFLMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)15.8515.97
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.402.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.312.19
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.162.18
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)23.10-110.12
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)13.4521.68
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.464.88