AFL vs. MET: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and MET, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AFL at 55.98 billion USD and MET at 52.29 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 0.83 for AFL and 0.83 for MET, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AFL | MET |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | MetLife, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Insurance - Life |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. Michel Abbas Khalaf |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 77.9 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 52.29 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.83 | 0.83 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | April 5, 2000 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and MET over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AFL and MET, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AFL | MET |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 12.22 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 1.06 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 0.72 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 2.00 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 3.16 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 15.63 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 0.63 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 2.79 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AFL and MET offer similar dividend yields (2.09% vs. 2.83%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | AFL | MET |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 2.83% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and MET, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AFL’s current ratio of 0.00 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while MET at 821.68 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AFL’s quick ratio of 0.00 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas MET at 821.68 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
| Symbol | AFL | MET |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 821.68 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 821.68 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.55 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | 4.94 |