Seek Returns logo

AFL vs. MARA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFL and MARA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AFL’s market capitalization of 56.54 billion USD is substantially larger than MARA’s 6.22 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

MARA carries a higher beta at 6.63, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AFL (beta: 0.81) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAFLMARA
Company NameAflac IncorporatedMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - LifeFinancial - Capital Markets
CEODaniel Paul AmosFrederick G. Thiel
Price104.57 USD17.66 USD
Market Cap56.54 billion USD6.22 billion USD
Beta0.816.63
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980May 4, 2012
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFL and MARA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFL vs. MARA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFL

13.91%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
23.38%
Q3
14.56%
Median
11.23%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-5.23%

AFL’s Return on Equity of 13.91% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Life industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MARA

-9.86%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
42.02%
Q3
20.69%
Median
13.73%
Q1
3.33%
Min
-21.32%

MARA has a negative Return on Equity of -9.86%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFL

2.99%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
6.30%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.16%
Q1
0.68%
Min
-0.10%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Life industry.

MARA

-9.06%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
30.24%
Q3
13.34%
Median
6.20%
Q1
-1.71%
Min
-16.91%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFL

21.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
21.20%
Q3
11.59%
Median
7.10%
Q1
3.79%
Min
2.14%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.03% places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MARA

-46.68%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
28.67%
Q3
13.52%
Median
10.47%
Q1
0.24%
Min
-9.55%

MARA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -46.68%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFL

25.70%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
38.96%
Q3
37.28%
Median
14.06%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-1.68%

In the Insurance - Life industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

MARA

-85.76%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
56.86%
Q3
25.29%
Median
15.90%
Q1
0.51%
Min
-19.18%

MARA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -85.76%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFLMARA
Return on Equity (TTM)13.91%-9.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%-5.11%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)2.99%-9.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.03%-46.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.70%-85.76%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.82%1.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFL

--

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
843.97
Q3
821.68
Median
6.06
Q1
3.15
Min
0.47

Current Ratio data for AFL is currently unavailable.

MARA

0.79

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
4.60
Q3
3.24
Median
1.32
Q1
0.96
Min
0.05

For the Financial - Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFL

0.29

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
0.86
Q3
0.83
Median
0.55
Q1
0.37
Min
0.27

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, AFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MARA

0.71

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.68
Median
0.37
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

MARA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.71 is typical for the Financial - Capital Markets industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFL

21.96

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
37.82
Q3
19.50
Median
6.25
Q1
2.29
Min
-0.76

AFL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.96 is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MARA

-27.89

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
12.71
Q3
7.94
Median
1.92
Q1
0.24
Min
-7.71

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFLMARA
Current Ratio (TTM)--0.79
Quick Ratio (TTM)--0.79
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.290.71
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.41
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.577.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)21.95-27.89

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFL and MARA. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFL

2.07%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
10.36%
Q3
4.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.51%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Yield of 2.07% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance - Life industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MARA

0.00%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
5.86%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MARA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFL

31.03%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
203.94%
Q3
64.38%
Median
29.88%
Q1
19.14%
Min
0.00%

AFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.03% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Life industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MARA

0.00%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
128.06%
Q3
43.11%
Median
12.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MARA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFLMARA
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.03%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFL

15.85

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
17.82
Q3
16.08
Median
12.43
Q1
7.33
Min
3.69

AFL’s P/E Ratio of 15.85 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MARA

-18.46

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
42.65
Q3
29.09
Median
20.52
Q1
14.58
Min
8.28

MARA has a negative P/E Ratio of -18.46. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFL

2.40

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.81
Q3
1.95
Median
0.97
Q1
0.53
Min
0.24

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.40 places AFL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

MARA

0.98

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
4.05
Q3
2.46
Median
1.52
Q1
0.78
Min
0.02

MARA’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.98 is within the middle range of its peers in the Financial - Capital Markets industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFL

3.31

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.84
Q3
2.89
Median
1.06
Q1
0.63
Min
0.31

AFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.31 is in the upper echelon for the Insurance - Life industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MARA

8.81

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.34
Q3
7.63
Median
2.98
Q1
1.50
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFL

2.16

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.87
Q3
2.13
Median
1.49
Q1
0.95
Min
0.38

AFL’s P/B Ratio of 2.16 is in the upper tier for the Insurance - Life industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MARA

1.63

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.60
Q3
6.00
Median
2.91
Q1
1.84
Min
0.53

MARA’s P/B Ratio of 1.63 is in the lower quartile for the Financial - Capital Markets industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AFL vs. MARA: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Insurance - Life and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFLMARA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)15.85-18.46
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.400.98
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.318.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.161.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)23.10-5.05
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)13.4526.02
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.4612.28