AFL vs. FUTU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AFL and FUTU, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AFL dominates in value with a market cap of 55.98 billion USD, eclipsing FUTU’s 15.24 billion USD by roughly 3.67×.
With betas of 0.83 for AFL and 0.67 for FUTU, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
FUTU is an ADR, letting U.S. buyers tap its non-U.S. business directly, unlike AFL, which is purely domestic.
| Symbol | AFL | FUTU |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aflac Incorporated | Futu Holdings Limited |
| Country | US | HK |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Financial - Capital Markets |
| CEO | Mr. Daniel Paul Amos | Mr. Hua Li |
| Price | 103.54 USD | 109.49 USD |
| Market Cap | 55.98 billion USD | 15.24 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.83 | 0.67 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 17, 1980 | March 8, 2019 |
| ADR | No | Yes |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AFL and FUTU over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AFL and FUTU, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AFL | FUTU |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 15.70 | 22.06 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 1.29 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.09 | 9.03 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.14 | 4.29 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 22.88 | 0.00 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 13.32 | 17.54 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.27 | 8.79 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 23.91 | 0.00 |
Dividend Comparison
AFL’s dividend yield of 2.09% is about 817% higher than FUTU’s 0.23%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AFL | FUTU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.09% | 0.23% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AFL and FUTU, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AFL’s current ratio of 0.00 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while FUTU at 1.19 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AFL’s quick ratio of 0.00 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas FUTU at 1.19 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AFL (at 21.95) covers its interest payments, while FUTU shows “--” for minimal debt service.
| Symbol | AFL | FUTU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.31 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.05 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 21.95 | -- |