Seek Returns logo

AFG vs. ITUB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AFG and ITUB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ITUB’s market capitalization of 70.93 billion USD is significantly greater than AFG’s 10.64 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AFG’s beta of 0.71 points to significantly higher volatility compared to ITUB (beta: 0.31), suggesting AFG has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

ITUB is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AFG, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAFGITUB
Company NameAmerican Financial Group, Inc.Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A.
CountryUSBR
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - Property & CasualtyBanks - Regional
CEOStephen Craig LindnerMilton Maluhy Filho
Price127.43 USD6.92 USD
Market Cap10.64 billion USD70.93 billion USD
Beta0.710.31
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980February 25, 2002
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AFG and ITUB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AFG vs. ITUB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AFG

17.81%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
28.14%
Q3
17.51%
Median
12.75%
Q1
8.26%
Min
0.61%

In the upper quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, AFG’s Return on Equity of 17.81% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ITUB

20.70%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
19.20%
Q3
11.87%
Median
9.48%
Q1
6.66%
Min
-0.15%

ITUB’s Return on Equity of 20.70% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Banks - Regional industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AFG

27.67%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
21.89%
Q3
10.09%
Median
3.90%
Q1
0.89%
Min
-7.26%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry.

ITUB

1.37%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
13.33%
Q3
7.16%
Median
5.31%
Q1
2.87%
Min
-3.49%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Banks - Regional industry.

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AFG

13.06%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
21.98%
Q3
13.09%
Median
9.18%
Q1
6.10%
Min
2.13%

AFG’s Net Profit Margin of 13.06% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ITUB

14.96%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
32.03%
Q3
21.35%
Median
16.99%
Q1
12.69%
Min
0.27%

ITUB’s Net Profit Margin of 14.96% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks - Regional industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AFG

14.02%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
31.70%
Q3
17.32%
Median
12.57%
Q1
7.38%
Min
4.31%

AFG’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.02% is around the midpoint for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ITUB

18.38%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
40.01%
Q3
26.24%
Median
21.14%
Q1
15.85%
Min
1.50%

ITUB’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.38% is around the midpoint for the Banks - Regional industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAFGITUB
Return on Equity (TTM)17.81%20.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.64%1.49%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)27.67%1.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.06%14.96%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.02%18.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)69.59%46.31%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AFG

--

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
51.52
Q3
30.84
Median
20.50
Q1
6.61
Min
0.41

Current Ratio data for AFG is currently unavailable.

ITUB

--

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
0.39
Q3
0.22
Median
0.15
Q1
0.10
Min
0.01

For the Banks - Regional industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AFG

0.34

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
0.58
Q3
0.36
Median
0.27
Q1
0.14
Min
0.01

AFG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ITUB

1.89

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
0.81
Median
0.42
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.89, ITUB operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Banks - Regional industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AFG

11.29

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
39.40
Q3
22.24
Median
12.38
Q1
6.68
Min
-12.40

AFG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.29 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ITUB

0.40

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.84
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
-0.35

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks - Regional industry.

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAFGITUB
Current Ratio (TTM)----
Quick Ratio (TTM)----
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.341.89
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.050.14
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.317.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.290.40

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AFG and ITUB. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AFG

7.15%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.10%
Median
1.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 7.15%, AFG offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ITUB

10.58%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
11.72%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.00%
Q1
1.68%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 10.58%, ITUB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Banks - Regional industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AFG

94.24%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
115.20%
Q3
35.27%
Median
22.19%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.00%

AFG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.24% is in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ITUB

61.96%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
155.35%
Q3
50.05%
Median
34.14%
Q1
18.61%
Min
0.00%

ITUB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.96% is in the upper quartile for the Banks - Regional industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAFGITUB
Dividend Yield (TTM)7.15%10.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)94.24%61.96%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AFG

13.36

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
35.83
Q3
23.28
Median
14.49
Q1
11.91
Min
4.47

AFG’s P/E Ratio of 13.36 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ITUB

9,211.91

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
22.32
Q3
15.38
Median
12.31
Q1
10.72
Min
4.30

At 9,211.91, ITUB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Banks - Regional industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AFG

1.41

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
1.90
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

AFG’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.41 is within the middle range of its peers in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ITUB

1,307.13

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.13
Median
1.25
Q1
0.71
Min
0.02

ITUB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1,307.13 is exceptionally high for the Banks - Regional industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AFG

1.74

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
2.39
Median
1.80
Q1
1.01
Min
0.50

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry.

ITUB

1.34

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
4.28
Q3
2.76
Median
2.17
Q1
1.71
Min
0.55

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks - Regional industry.

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AFG

2.43

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
5.34
Q3
2.95
Median
1.92
Q1
1.31
Min
0.52

AFG’s P/B Ratio of 2.43 is within the conventional range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ITUB

1,913.51

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.35
Median
1.09
Q1
0.92
Min
0.33

At 1,913.51, ITUB’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Banks - Regional industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AFG vs. ITUB: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Insurance - Property & Casualty and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAFGITUB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)13.369211.91
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.411307.13
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.741.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.431913.51
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)7.47-16.01
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)16.6816.99
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.772.45