Seek Returns logo

AEVA vs. MBLY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AEVA and MBLY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

MBLY’s market capitalization of 15.49 billion USD is significantly greater than AEVA’s 1.81 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AEVA’s beta of 1.67 points to significantly higher volatility compared to MBLY (beta: 0.47), suggesting AEVA has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAEVAMBLY
Company NameAeva Technologies, Inc.Mobileye Global Inc.
CountryUSIL
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustryAuto - PartsAuto - Parts
CEOSoroush Salehian DardashtiAmnon Shashua
Price32.89 USD19.08 USD
Market Cap1.81 billion USD15.49 billion USD
Beta1.670.47
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateFebruary 27, 2020October 26, 2022
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AEVA and MBLY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AEVA vs. MBLY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AEVA

-132.76%

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
50.60%
Q3
20.37%
Median
8.74%
Q1
-2.05%
Min
-23.36%

AEVA has a negative Return on Equity of -132.76%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MBLY

-23.36%

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
50.60%
Q3
20.37%
Median
8.74%
Q1
-2.05%
Min
-23.36%

MBLY has a negative Return on Equity of -23.36%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their ROE against the Auto - Parts industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

AEVA

-169.59%

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
27.30%
Q3
14.26%
Median
6.70%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-11.15%

AEVA has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -169.59%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

MBLY

-24.87%

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
27.30%
Q3
14.26%
Median
6.70%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-11.15%

MBLY has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -24.87%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their ROIC against the Auto - Parts industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

AEVA

-1,470.09%

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
16.94%
Q3
7.68%
Median
2.28%
Q1
-0.43%
Min
-4.93%

AEVA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1,470.09%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MBLY

-160.50%

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
16.94%
Q3
7.68%
Median
2.28%
Q1
-0.43%
Min
-4.93%

MBLY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -160.50%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Auto - Parts industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

AEVA

-1,355.28%

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
19.28%
Q3
10.18%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.26%
Min
2.98%

AEVA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -1,355.28%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MBLY

-167.51%

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
19.28%
Q3
10.18%
Median
6.39%
Q1
3.26%
Min
2.98%

MBLY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -167.51%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Auto - Parts industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAEVAMBLY
Return on Equity (TTM)-132.76%-23.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)-132.52%-23.80%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-169.59%-24.87%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-1470.09%-160.50%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-1355.28%-167.51%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-20.22%48.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AEVA

2.88

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.88
Median
1.84
Q1
1.33
Min
0.53

AEVA’s Current Ratio of 2.88 is in the upper quartile for the Auto - Parts industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MBLY

7.64

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.88
Median
1.84
Q1
1.33
Min
0.53

MBLY’s Current Ratio of 7.64 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Auto - Parts industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Auto - Parts industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AEVA

0.00

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
1.78
Q3
0.96
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Auto - Parts industry, AEVA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MBLY

--

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
1.78
Q3
0.96
Median
0.64
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for MBLY is currently unavailable.

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Auto - Parts industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AEVA

--

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
15.73
Q3
10.07
Median
6.95
Q1
2.13
Min
-5.48

Interest Coverage Ratio data for AEVA is currently unavailable.

MBLY

--

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
15.73
Q3
10.07
Median
6.95
Q1
2.13
Min
-5.48

Interest Coverage Ratio data for MBLY is currently unavailable.

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Auto - Parts industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAEVAMBLY
Current Ratio (TTM)2.887.64
Quick Ratio (TTM)2.766.38
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.00--
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.00--
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.160.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)----

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AEVA and MBLY. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AEVA

0.00%

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
7.63%
Q3
2.33%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AEVA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MBLY

0.00%

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
7.63%
Q3
2.33%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MBLY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Auto - Parts industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AEVA

0.00%

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
82.34%
Q3
32.60%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AEVA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MBLY

0.00%

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
82.34%
Q3
32.60%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MBLY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Auto - Parts industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAEVAMBLY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AEVA

-11.86

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
29.34
Q3
21.35
Median
12.77
Q1
10.32
Min
7.75

AEVA has a negative P/E Ratio of -11.86. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

MBLY

-5.21

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
29.34
Q3
21.35
Median
12.77
Q1
10.32
Min
7.75

MBLY has a negative P/E Ratio of -5.21. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Auto - Parts industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AEVA

-11.31

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
2.08
Q3
1.28
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.09

AEVA has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -11.31. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

MBLY

-0.08

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
2.08
Q3
1.28
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.09

MBLY has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -0.08. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Auto - Parts industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AEVA

175.26

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.85
Median
0.66
Q1
0.37
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 175.26, AEVA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Auto - Parts industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MBLY

8.36

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.85
Median
0.66
Q1
0.37
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 8.36, MBLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Auto - Parts industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Auto - Parts industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AEVA

26.17

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
5.93
Q3
3.06
Median
1.56
Q1
1.12
Min
0.60

At 26.17, AEVA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Auto - Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MBLY

1.29

Auto - Parts Industry

Max
5.93
Q3
3.06
Median
1.56
Q1
1.12
Min
0.60

MBLY’s P/B Ratio of 1.29 is within the conventional range for the Auto - Parts industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AEVA vs. MBLY: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Auto - Parts industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAEVAMBLY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-11.86-5.21
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-11.31-0.08
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)175.268.36
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)26.171.29
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-12.8739.12
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-13.34-5.20
EV-to-Sales (TTM)173.227.55