Seek Returns logo

AER vs. BAH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AER and BAH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AER’s market capitalization of 20.46 billion USD is substantially larger than BAH’s 13.52 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

AER’s beta of 1.40 points to significantly higher volatility compared to BAH (beta: 0.49), suggesting AER has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAERBAH
Company NameAerCap Holdings N.V.Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
CountryIEUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryRental & Leasing ServicesConsulting Services
CEOAengus KellyHoracio D. Rozanski
Price115.89 USD108.93 USD
Market Cap20.46 billion USD13.52 billion USD
Beta1.400.49
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 21, 2006November 18, 2010
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AER and BAH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AER vs. BAH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AER

12.55%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
33.37%
Q3
21.32%
Median
10.48%
Q1
2.04%
Min
-2.71%

AER’s Return on Equity of 12.55% is on par with the norm for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BAH

84.96%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
26.22%
Q3
25.78%
Median
23.70%
Q1
12.26%
Min
8.67%

BAH’s Return on Equity of 84.96% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consulting Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AER

3.17%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
19.57%
Q3
13.92%
Median
5.28%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-10.86%

AER’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.17% is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This indicates a less efficient conversion of invested capital into profit compared to most of its competitors.

BAH

--

Consulting Services Industry

Max
33.93%
Q3
19.78%
Median
12.27%
Q1
8.32%
Min
5.66%

Return on Invested Capital data for BAH is currently unavailable.

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AER

26.77%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
26.77%
Q3
17.31%
Median
5.12%
Q1
-0.51%
Min
-19.03%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.77% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BAH

6.20%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
22.69%
Q3
14.78%
Median
7.88%
Q1
6.68%
Min
5.45%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Consulting Services industry, BAH’s Net Profit Margin of 6.20% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AER

32.92%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
53.21%
Q3
29.93%
Median
16.64%
Q1
8.88%
Min
-12.57%

An Operating Profit Margin of 32.92% places AER in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BAH

9.14%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
34.23%
Q3
21.10%
Median
10.99%
Q1
9.29%
Min
8.13%

BAH’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.14% is in the lower quartile for the Consulting Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAERBAH
Return on Equity (TTM)12.55%84.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.95%--
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)3.17%--
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.77%6.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)32.92%9.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)38.97%66.28%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AER

3.12

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
7.05
Q3
3.95
Median
1.87
Q1
0.85
Min
0.64

AER’s Current Ratio of 3.12 aligns with the median group of the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BAH

--

Consulting Services Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
2.20
Median
1.69
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

Current Ratio data for BAH is currently unavailable.

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AER

2.69

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
3.95
Q3
3.50
Median
2.49
Q1
0.92
Min
0.00

AER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.69 is typical for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BAH

--

Consulting Services Industry

Max
1.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.17
Min
0.06

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for BAH is currently unavailable.

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AER

5.50

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.53
Q3
5.33
Median
2.35
Q1
1.41
Min
-1.09

AER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.50 is in the upper quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

BAH

7.67

Consulting Services Industry

Max
45.92
Q3
30.67
Median
10.52
Q1
7.67
Min
3.02

BAH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.67 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Consulting Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAERBAH
Current Ratio (TTM)3.12--
Quick Ratio (TTM)3.06--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)2.69--
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.64--
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)8.63--
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.507.67

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AER and BAH. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AER

0.66%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.29%
Q3
1.60%
Median
0.72%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Yield of 0.66% is consistent with its peers in the Rental & Leasing Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BAH

1.95%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
2.06%
Q3
0.84%
Median
0.54%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.95%, BAH offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Consulting Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AER

6.80%

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
260.58%
Q3
29.91%
Median
17.33%
Q1
6.80%
Min
0.00%

AER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.80% is within the typical range for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BAH

36.10%

Consulting Services Industry

Max
55.92%
Q3
28.27%
Median
23.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BAH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.10% is in the upper quartile for the Consulting Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAERBAH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.66%1.95%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.80%36.10%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AER

9.85

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
32.56
Q3
29.28
Median
17.35
Q1
9.97
Min
5.76

In the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry, AER’s P/E Ratio of 9.85 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

BAH

18.84

Consulting Services Industry

Max
51.91
Q3
40.33
Median
21.50
Q1
17.51
Min
10.23

BAH’s P/E Ratio of 18.84 is within the middle range for the Consulting Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AER

1.33

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
2.33
Median
1.39
Q1
0.91
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Rental & Leasing Services industry.

BAH

2.00

Consulting Services Industry

Max
4.82
Q3
3.61
Median
2.04
Q1
1.65
Min
0.72

BAH’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.00 is within the middle range of its peers in the Consulting Services industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AER

2.56

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
6.35
Q3
3.16
Median
2.03
Q1
0.60
Min
0.25

AER’s P/S Ratio of 2.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BAH

1.13

Consulting Services Industry

Max
6.73
Q3
4.77
Median
1.83
Q1
1.28
Min
0.77

In the lower quartile for the Consulting Services industry, BAH’s P/S Ratio of 1.13 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AER

1.22

Rental & Leasing Services Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
2.65
Median
2.02
Q1
1.37
Min
0.69

AER’s P/B Ratio of 1.22 is in the lower quartile for the Rental & Leasing Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

BAH

--

Consulting Services Industry

Max
8.62
Q3
6.18
Median
4.55
Q1
2.94
Min
1.61

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Consulting Services industry.

AER vs. BAH: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Rental & Leasing Services and Consulting Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAERBAH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)9.8518.84
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.332.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.561.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.22--
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-9.8018.86
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)12.5410.88
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.221.13