Seek Returns logo

AEP vs. VST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AEP and VST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AEP’s market capitalization stands at 55.48 billion USD, while VST’s is 65.22 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

VST carries a higher beta at 1.25, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AEP (beta: 0.41) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAEPVST
Company NameAmerican Electric Power Company, Inc.Vistra Corp.
CountryUSUS
SectorUtilitiesUtilities
IndustryRegulated ElectricIndependent Power Producers
CEOWilliam J. FehrmanJames A. Burke CPA
Price103.86 USD192.2 USD
Market Cap55.48 billion USD65.22 billion USD
Beta0.411.25
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateJanuary 2, 1962October 5, 2016
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AEP and VST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AEP vs. VST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AEP

10.33%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
18.07%
Q3
12.49%
Median
10.00%
Q1
8.48%
Min
5.02%

AEP’s Return on Equity of 10.33% is on par with the norm for the Regulated Electric industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VST

45.28%

Independent Power Producers Industry

Max
47.87%
Q3
44.92%
Median
37.16%
Q1
23.52%
Min
2.99%

In the upper quartile for the Independent Power Producers industry, VST’s Return on Equity of 45.28% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Regulated Electric and Independent Power Producers industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AEP

4.16%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
5.26%
Q3
4.57%
Median
3.97%
Q1
3.33%
Min
1.92%

AEP’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.16% is in line with the norm for the Regulated Electric industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

VST

10.63%

Independent Power Producers Industry

Max
12.59%
Q3
7.91%
Median
1.68%
Q1
1.19%
Min
-2.93%

In the upper quartile for the Independent Power Producers industry, VST’s Return on Invested Capital of 10.63% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Regulated Electric and Independent Power Producers industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AEP

13.71%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
22.24%
Q3
15.98%
Median
13.10%
Q1
11.03%
Min
3.79%

AEP’s Net Profit Margin of 13.71% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Regulated Electric industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VST

13.40%

Independent Power Producers Industry

Max
33.58%
Q3
32.41%
Median
13.40%
Q1
3.33%
Min
-15.14%

VST’s Net Profit Margin of 13.40% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Independent Power Producers industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Regulated Electric and Independent Power Producers industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AEP

21.90%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
31.57%
Q3
25.65%
Median
21.93%
Q1
17.87%
Min
8.99%

AEP’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.90% is around the midpoint for the Regulated Electric industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VST

21.41%

Independent Power Producers Industry

Max
21.41%
Q3
17.04%
Median
9.17%
Q1
6.05%
Min
5.60%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.41% places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power Producers industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Regulated Electric and Independent Power Producers industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAEPVST
Return on Equity (TTM)10.33%45.28%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.65%6.35%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.16%10.63%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.71%13.40%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.90%21.41%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)62.60%41.31%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AEP

0.42

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
1.48
Q3
1.06
Median
0.86
Q1
0.73
Min
0.28

AEP’s Current Ratio of 0.42 falls into the lower quartile for the Regulated Electric industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VST

0.86

Independent Power Producers Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
1.84
Median
1.62
Q1
0.96
Min
0.84

VST’s Current Ratio of 0.86 falls into the lower quartile for the Independent Power Producers industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Regulated Electric and Independent Power Producers industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AEP

1.72

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
2.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.65
Q1
1.28
Min
0.27

AEP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.72 is typical for the Regulated Electric industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VST

3.67

Independent Power Producers Industry

Max
3.96
Q3
3.42
Median
2.61
Q1
1.23
Min
0.64

VST’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Independent Power Producers industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.67. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Regulated Electric and Independent Power Producers industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AEP

2.30

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
3.07
Q3
2.63
Median
2.41
Q1
2.30
Min
1.87

In the lower quartile for the Regulated Electric industry, AEP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.30 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

VST

4.28

Independent Power Producers Industry

Max
4.38
Q3
3.24
Median
1.20
Q1
0.44
Min
-1.77

VST’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.28 is in the upper quartile for the Independent Power Producers industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Regulated Electric and Independent Power Producers industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAEPVST
Current Ratio (TTM)0.420.86
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.310.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.723.67
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.450.46
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)6.422.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.304.28

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AEP and VST. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AEP

3.53%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
6.60%
Q3
4.03%
Median
3.30%
Q1
3.06%
Min
0.00%

AEP’s Dividend Yield of 3.53% is consistent with its peers in the Regulated Electric industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VST

0.46%

Independent Power Producers Industry

Max
12.31%
Q3
1.36%
Median
0.46%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Yield of 0.46% is consistent with its peers in the Independent Power Producers industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Regulated Electric and Independent Power Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AEP

70.11%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
123.06%
Q3
69.07%
Median
62.27%
Q1
52.66%
Min
0.00%

AEP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 70.11% is in the upper quartile for the Regulated Electric industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

VST

20.82%

Independent Power Producers Industry

Max
233.96%
Q3
32.48%
Median
25.36%
Q1
5.20%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.82% is within the typical range for the Independent Power Producers industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Regulated Electric and Independent Power Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAEPVST
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.53%0.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)70.11%20.82%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AEP

20.04

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
26.46
Q3
21.71
Median
19.07
Q1
17.74
Min
12.74

AEP’s P/E Ratio of 20.04 is within the middle range for the Regulated Electric industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VST

26.92

Independent Power Producers Industry

Max
27.32
Q3
26.49
Median
23.81
Q1
10.35
Min
3.54

A P/E Ratio of 26.92 places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power Producers industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Regulated Electric and Independent Power Producers industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AEP

2.79

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
3.10
Median
2.78
Q1
2.34
Min
1.46

AEP’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.79 is within the middle range of its peers in the Regulated Electric industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

VST

0.79

Independent Power Producers Industry

Max
5.73
Q3
4.40
Median
2.18
Q1
1.13
Min
0.32

In the lower quartile for the Independent Power Producers industry, VST’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.79 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Regulated Electric and Independent Power Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AEP

2.75

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
3.88
Q3
3.19
Median
2.68
Q1
1.96
Min
0.27

AEP’s P/S Ratio of 2.75 aligns with the market consensus for the Regulated Electric industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VST

3.60

Independent Power Producers Industry

Max
3.66
Q3
3.17
Median
1.99
Q1
1.36
Min
0.62

VST’s P/S Ratio of 3.60 is in the upper echelon for the Independent Power Producers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Regulated Electric and Independent Power Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AEP

2.03

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
2.95
Q3
2.37
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.55

AEP’s P/B Ratio of 2.03 is within the conventional range for the Regulated Electric industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VST

13.54

Independent Power Producers Industry

Max
13.74
Q3
11.59
Median
7.05
Q1
1.63
Min
1.18

VST’s P/B Ratio of 13.54 is in the upper tier for the Independent Power Producers industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AEP vs. VST: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Regulated Electric and Independent Power Producers industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAEPVST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)20.0426.92
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.790.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.753.60
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.0313.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-42.7126.42
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.0612.15
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.074.55