AEM vs. SHW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AEM and SHW, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength.
Company Overview
SHW’s market capitalization of 89.58 billion USD is significantly greater than AEM’s 59.60 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.
SHW carries a higher beta at 1.21, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AEM (beta: 0.50) exhibits greater stability.
| Symbol | AEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country | CA | US |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Gold | Chemicals - Specialty |
| CEO | Mr. Ammar Al-Joundi M.B.A., P.Eng. | Ms. Heidi G. Petz |
| Price | 117.895 USD | 357.48 USD |
| Market Cap | 59.60 billion USD | 89.58 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.50 | 1.21 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 1, 1972 | March 17, 1980 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AEM and SHW over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
- AEM: $18596.82 (85.97%)
- SHW: $12176.58 (21.77%)
Valuation Metrics Comparison
This section compares the market valuation of AEM and SHW. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.
- SHW’s Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 21.59 is very high. This suggests that investors are valuing its assets and growth potential at a considerable premium to its stated book value, often due to strong return on equity, significant intangible assets, or optimistic growth forecasts.
| Symbol | AEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 25.02 | 33.27 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -4.28 | 2.75 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.67 | 3.89 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.74 | 21.59 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 11.55 | 22.87 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.68 | 4.44 |
Dividend Comparison
AEM’s dividend yield of 1.36% is notably higher than SHW’s 0.84%, suggesting a stronger emphasis on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.36% | 0.84% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section evaluates the financial strength of AEM and SHW. Noteworthy observations on their financial resilience, considered from an industry perspective, are detailed in the points that follow.
- SHW’s current ratio of 0.77 falls into the low category. This can indicate potential stress on the company's ability to address its short-term liabilities, suggesting that its liquid assets may not provide a strong safety margin over its immediate financial commitments, possibly impacting its operational flexibility.
| Symbol | AEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 0.77 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.20 | 0.45 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 3.10 |
| Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.04 | 0.52 |
| Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 2.82 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 45.23 | 9.13 |