AEM vs. SHW: Agnico Eagle Mines vs. Sherwin-Williams Stock Comparison
How do Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) both fall under the Materials industry group, but AEM is classified in Metals & Mining while SHW is classified in Chemicals.
| Profile Item | AEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Gold | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 96.85 billion USD | 83.13 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | AEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 24.35% | 5.74% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 64.16% | 13.18% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 32.08% | 2.84% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | AEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 49.17% | 29.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.62 | 1.02 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.80% | -42.46% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.33M | 1.72M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | AEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.41 | 0.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.59 | 0.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 63.70% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 23.24% also sits in the top quartile.
AEM
Materials industry group
23.24%
- Max
- 52.88%
- AEM
- 23.24%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
SHW
Materials industry group
63.70%
- SHW
- 63.70%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 41.01% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 10.74% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.
AEM
Materials industry group
41.01%
- AEM
- 41.01%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
SHW
Materials industry group
10.74%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- SHW
- 10.74%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 55.49% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 17.56%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
AEM
Materials industry group
55.49%
- Max
- 66.70%
- AEM
- 55.49%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
SHW
Materials industry group
17.56%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- SHW
- 17.56%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | AEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 23.24% | 63.70% |
| ROA (TTM) | 15.80% | 9.48% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 41.01% | 10.74% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 55.49% | 17.56% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 74.52% | 48.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 43.71% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 2.06% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for AEM.
EPS Growth
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 134.39% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at -2.75% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for AEM.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | AEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 43.71% | 2.06% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 27.53% | 2.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 134.39% | -2.75% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 79.58% | 9.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 2.75 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SHW.
AEM
Materials industry group
2.75
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- AEM
- 2.75
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
SHW
Materials industry group
0.71
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- SHW
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.72 is above its industry debt-to-equity ratio range.
AEM
Materials industry group
0.01
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- AEM
- 0.01
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.72
- SHW
- 3.72
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | AEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.75 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.01 | 3.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.31 | 3.04 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 0.93% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 0.91% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
AEM
Materials industry group
0.93%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- AEM
- 0.93%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
0.91%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- SHW
- 0.91%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 14.26% and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 29.35% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
AEM
Materials industry group
14.26%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- AEM
- 14.26%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SHW
Materials industry group
29.35%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- SHW
- 29.35%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | AEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.93% | 0.91% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 14.26% | 29.35% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 15.61 and Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 31.66 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
AEM
Materials industry group
15.61
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- AEM
- 15.61
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
SHW
Materials industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- SHW
- 31.66
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 3.34 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 6.44 sits in the pricier quartile — AEM costs more per dollar of sales.
AEM
Materials industry group
6.44
- Max
- 9.62
- AEM
- 6.44
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
SHW
Materials industry group
3.34
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- SHW
- 3.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 3.27 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Sherwin-Williams (SHW) at 20.78 prices above its benchmark range — SHW looks rich relative to book.
AEM
Materials industry group
3.27
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- AEM
- 3.27
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
SHW
Materials industry group
20.78
- SHW
- 20.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | AEM | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 15.61 | 31.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 6.44 | 3.34 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.27 | 20.78 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.87% | 2.98% |