AEM vs. NTR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on July 7, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AEM and NTR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AEM’s market capitalization of 60.70 billion USD is substantially larger than NTR’s 29.32 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

NTR carries a higher beta at 1.19, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AEM (beta: 0.50) exhibits greater stability.

Symbol	AEM	NTR
Company Name	Agnico Eagle Mines Limited	Nutrien Ltd.
Country	CA	CA
Sector	Basic Materials	Basic Materials
Industry	Gold	Agricultural Inputs
CEO	Ammar Al-Joundi	Kenneth A. Seitz
Price	120.06 USD	60.14 USD
Market Cap	60.70 billion USD	29.32 billion USD
Beta	0.50	1.19
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
IPO Date	June 1, 1972	January 2, 2018
ADR	No	No

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AEM and NTR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AEM vs. NTR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AEM

11.41%

Gold Industry

Max: 25.86%
Q3: 12.48%
Median: 8.15%
Q1: 2.34%
Min: -3.82%

AEM’s Return on Equity of 11.41% is on par with the norm for the Gold industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NTR

2.14%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max: 7.27%
Q3: 7.27%
Median: 4.65%
Q1: 2.14%
Min: 2.14%

NTR’s Return on Equity of 2.14% is on par with the norm for the Agricultural Inputs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AEM

8.50%

Gold Industry

Max: 20.84%
Q3: 9.90%
Median: 5.11%
Q1: 1.36%
Min: -10.62%

AEM’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.50% is in line with the norm for the Gold industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

NTR

1.24%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max: 11.45%
Q3: 9.49%
Median: 5.13%
Q1: 2.30%
Min: 1.24%

NTR’s Return on Invested Capital of 1.24% is in the lower quartile for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This indicates a less efficient conversion of invested capital into profit compared to most of its competitors.

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AEM

26.48%

Gold Industry

Max: 26.48%
Q3: 21.01%
Median: 16.48%
Q1: 8.22%
Min: -6.63%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.48% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Gold industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NTR

2.06%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max: 13.95%
Q3: 7.95%
Median: 5.66%
Q1: 2.06%
Min: 1.04%

NTR’s Net Profit Margin of 2.06% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Agricultural Inputs industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AEM

41.82%

Gold Industry

Max: 67.43%
Q3: 40.39%
Median: 30.64%
Q1: 19.83%
Min: -9.84%

An Operating Profit Margin of 41.82% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Gold industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NTR

3.65%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max: 23.04%
Q3: 14.70%
Median: 11.01%
Q1: 7.11%
Min: 3.65%

NTR’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.65% is in the lower quartile for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AEM	NTR
Return on Equity (TTM)	11.41%	2.14%
Return on Assets (TTM)	7.74%	0.99%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)	8.50%	1.24%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	26.48%	2.06%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	41.82%	3.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	48.06%	29.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AEM

2.37

Gold Industry

Max: 4.98
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.34
Q1: 1.51
Min: 0.52

AEM’s Current Ratio of 2.37 aligns with the median group of the Gold industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NTR

1.22

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max: 2.59
Q3: 2.50
Median: 1.54
Q1: 1.44
Min: 1.12

NTR’s Current Ratio of 1.22 falls into the lower quartile for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AEM

0.06

Gold Industry

Max: 0.67
Q3: 0.34
Median: 0.17
Q1: 0.06
Min: 0.00

AEM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 is typical for the Gold industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NTR

0.61

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max: 0.91
Q3: 0.65
Median: 0.42
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.01

NTR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.61 is typical for the Agricultural Inputs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AEM

45.23

Gold Industry

Max: 45.23
Q3: 25.79
Median: 13.44
Q1: 2.91
Min: -6.26

AEM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.23 is in the upper quartile for the Gold industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

NTR

1.30

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max: 4.73
Q3: 4.73
Median: 3.51
Q1: 1.95
Min: 1.30

In the lower quartile for the Agricultural Inputs industry, NTR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.30 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AEM	NTR
Current Ratio (TTM)	2.37	1.22
Quick Ratio (TTM)	1.20	0.59
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)	0.06	0.61
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)	0.04	0.28
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)	0.03	3.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	45.23	1.30

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AEM and NTR. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AEM

1.33%

Gold Industry

Max: 3.65%
Q3: 1.37%
Median: 0.47%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Yield of 1.33% is consistent with its peers in the Gold industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NTR

3.61%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max: 8.05%
Q3: 5.41%
Median: 3.73%
Q1: 2.20%
Min: 0.00%

NTR’s Dividend Yield of 3.61% is consistent with its peers in the Agricultural Inputs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AEM

29.17%

Gold Industry

Max: 110.70%
Q3: 42.09%
Median: 15.45%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.17% is within the typical range for the Gold industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NTR

200.91%

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max: 424.10%
Q3: 73.93%
Median: 66.58%
Q1: 26.42%
Min: 0.00%

NTR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 200.91% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AEM	NTR
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.33%	3.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	29.17%	200.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AEM

25.48

Gold Industry

Max: 64.00
Q3: 46.06
Median: 29.03
Q1: 16.74
Min: 1.00

AEM’s P/E Ratio of 25.48 is within the middle range for the Gold industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTR

55.85

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max: 53.97
Q3: 47.01
Median: 26.38
Q1: 15.38
Min: 11.48

At 55.85, NTR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AEM

-3.79

Gold Industry

Max: 14.01
Q3: 6.52
Median: 3.33
Q1: 0.82
Min: 0.05

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Gold industry.

NTR

19.84

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max: 6.44
Q3: 5.70
Median: 2.87
Q1: 1.84
Min: 0.52

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Agricultural Inputs industry.

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AEM

6.79

Gold Industry

Max: 15.12
Q3: 7.63
Median: 3.25
Q1: 2.30
Min: 0.79

AEM’s P/S Ratio of 6.79 aligns with the market consensus for the Gold industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NTR

1.15

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max: 2.41
Q3: 1.73
Median: 1.30
Q1: 1.11
Min: 1.01

NTR’s P/S Ratio of 1.15 aligns with the market consensus for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AEM

2.79

Gold Industry

Max: 6.10
Q3: 3.60
Median: 2.02
Q1: 1.35
Min: 0.26

AEM’s P/B Ratio of 2.79 is within the conventional range for the Gold industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NTR

1.22

Agricultural Inputs Industry

Max: 3.21
Q3: 2.35
Median: 1.36
Q1: 1.13
Min: 0.95

NTR’s P/B Ratio of 1.22 is within the conventional range for the Agricultural Inputs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AEM vs. NTR: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Gold and Agricultural Inputs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AEM	NTR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)	25.48	55.85
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)	-3.79	19.84
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)	6.79	1.15
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)	2.79	1.22
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)	26.10	21.89
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)	11.76	10.70
EV-to-Sales (TTM)	6.80	1.69