Seek Returns logo

AEM vs. CLF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AEM and CLF, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAEMCLF
Company NameAgnico Eagle Mines LimitedCleveland-Cliffs Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningMetals & Mining
Market Capitalization85.60 billion USD6.88 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AEM and CLF by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AEM vs. CLF: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAEMCLF
5-Day Price Return1.74%9.45%
13-Week Price Return44.85%57.06%
26-Week Price Return51.57%91.46%
52-Week Price Return118.00%7.09%
Month-to-Date Return0.81%13.93%
Year-to-Date Return110.13%47.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.93M31.16M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.97M28.41M
3-Month Volatility28.81%56.43%
Beta0.891.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AEM

13.84%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.55%
Q3
17.74%
Median
9.00%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-21.32%

AEM’s Return on Equity of 13.84% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CLF

-26.06%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.55%
Q3
17.74%
Median
9.00%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-21.32%

CLF has a negative Return on Equity of -26.06%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AEM vs. CLF: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AEM

30.63%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
43.69%
Q3
19.12%
Median
6.48%
Q1
1.50%
Min
-20.21%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.63% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CLF

-9.03%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
43.69%
Q3
19.12%
Median
6.48%
Q1
1.50%
Min
-20.21%

CLF has a negative Net Profit Margin of -9.03%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AEM vs. CLF: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AEM

46.30%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
71.84%
Q3
32.31%
Median
12.50%
Q1
2.69%
Min
-23.81%

An Operating Profit Margin of 46.30% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CLF

-9.54%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
71.84%
Q3
32.31%
Median
12.50%
Q1
2.69%
Min
-23.81%

CLF has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -9.54%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AEM vs. CLF: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAEMCLF
Return on Equity (TTM)13.84%-26.06%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.70%-8.44%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)30.63%-9.03%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)46.30%-9.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.09%-5.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AEM

2.03

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.04
Median
1.96
Q1
1.42
Min
0.13

AEM’s Current Ratio of 2.03 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CLF

2.04

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.04
Median
1.96
Q1
1.42
Min
0.13

CLF’s Current Ratio of 2.04 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AEM vs. CLF: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AEM

0.03

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.51
Median
0.33
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, AEM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CLF

1.33

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.51
Median
0.33
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.33, CLF operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Metals & Mining industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AEM vs. CLF: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AEM

13.07

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
22.73
Median
5.76
Q1
0.82
Min
-21.72

AEM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CLF

-1.55

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
22.73
Median
5.76
Q1
0.82
Min
-21.72

CLF has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.55. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AEM vs. CLF: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAEMCLF
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.032.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.070.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.031.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.07-1.55

Growth

Revenue Growth

AEM vs. CLF: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AEM vs. CLF: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AEM

0.83%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.25%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Yield of 0.83% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CLF

0.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.25%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLF currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AEM vs. CLF: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AEM

23.87%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
62.06%
Median
33.17%
Q1
10.41%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 23.87% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CLF

0.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
62.06%
Median
33.17%
Q1
10.41%
Min
0.00%

CLF has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AEM vs. CLF: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAEMCLF
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.83%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)23.87%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AEM

28.73

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
83.04
Q3
41.69
Median
20.30
Q1
12.95
Min
1.75

AEM’s P/E Ratio of 28.73 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CLF

--

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
83.04
Q3
41.69
Median
20.30
Q1
12.95
Min
1.75

P/E Ratio data for CLF is currently unavailable.

AEM vs. CLF: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AEM

8.80

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
4.28
Median
2.37
Q1
0.86
Min
0.16

AEM’s P/S Ratio of 8.80 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CLF

0.37

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
4.28
Median
2.37
Q1
0.86
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CLF’s P/S Ratio of 0.37 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AEM vs. CLF: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AEM

2.58

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.45
Median
1.55
Q1
0.94
Min
0.34

AEM’s P/B Ratio of 2.58 is in the upper tier for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CLF

0.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.45
Median
1.55
Q1
0.94
Min
0.34

CLF’s P/B Ratio of 0.65 is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AEM vs. CLF: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAEMCLF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.73--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.800.37
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.580.65
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.694.75