AEM vs. APD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AEM and APD, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AEM (58.46 billion USD) and APD (60.01 billion USD) sit neck-and-neck in market cap terms.
APD dances to a riskier tune, sporting a beta of 0.89, while AEM keeps it calmer at 0.53.
| Symbol | AEM | APD |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. |
| Country | CA | US |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Gold | Chemicals - Specialty |
| CEO | Mr. Ammar Al-Joundi M.B.A., P.Eng. | Mr. Eduardo F. Menezes |
| Price | 115.63 USD | 269.67 USD |
| Market Cap | 58.46 billion USD | 60.01 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.527 | 0.89 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 1, 1972 | March 17, 1980 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AEM and APD over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AEM and APD based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AEM carries a negative Forward PEG of -4.30, hinting at analyst expectations of losses or shrinking earnings in the coming period—a potential warning for its future performance. On the flip side, APD at 5.00 sidesteps this concern with a more favorable outlook.
- APD has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -13.85, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, AEM at 25.14 maintains a positive cash position.
| Symbol | AEM | APD |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 24.54 | 39.17 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -4.30 | 5.00 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.54 | 4.99 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.68 | 4.08 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 25.14 | -13.85 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 11.32 | 22.15 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.55 | 6.24 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 25.20 | -17.31 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AEM at 1.38% and APD at 2.63% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet APD’s 2.63% yield, 90% above AEM’s 1.38%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while AEM leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.
| Symbol | AEM | APD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.38% | 2.63% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AEM and APD, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- APD’s current ratio of 1.00 dips below 1, leaving short-term liabilities larger than current assets—a scenario that could hinge on cash flow support. On the other hand, AEM at 2.37 has enough assets to handle its obligations.
| Symbol | AEM | APD |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 1.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.20 | 0.85 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 1.12 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.04 | 0.42 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 45.23 | 7.66 |