Seek Returns logo

AEM vs. ALB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AEM and ALB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAEMALB
Company NameAgnico Eagle Mines LimitedAlbemarle Corporation
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningChemicals
Market Capitalization85.22 billion USD10.38 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973February 22, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AEM and ALB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AEM vs. ALB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAEMALB
5-Day Price Return3.01%1.54%
13-Week Price Return45.45%31.26%
26-Week Price Return52.62%22.49%
52-Week Price Return113.02%-6.22%
Month-to-Date Return0.13%8.81%
Year-to-Date Return108.71%2.49%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.23M3.50M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.98M4.21M
3-Month Volatility28.90%64.59%
Beta0.871.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AEM

13.84%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.55%
Q3
17.74%
Median
9.00%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-21.32%

AEM’s Return on Equity of 13.84% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ALB

-9.19%

Chemicals Industry

Max
29.52%
Q3
13.18%
Median
6.53%
Q1
1.35%
Min
-11.86%

ALB has a negative Return on Equity of -9.19%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AEM vs. ALB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AEM

30.63%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
43.69%
Q3
19.12%
Median
6.48%
Q1
1.50%
Min
-20.21%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.63% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ALB

-18.61%

Chemicals Industry

Max
20.20%
Q3
9.15%
Median
3.94%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-10.43%

ALB has a negative Net Profit Margin of -18.61%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AEM vs. ALB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AEM

46.30%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
71.84%
Q3
32.31%
Median
12.50%
Q1
2.69%
Min
-23.81%

An Operating Profit Margin of 46.30% places AEM in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ALB

-20.78%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.82%
Median
7.98%
Q1
3.60%
Min
-7.61%

ALB has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -20.78%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AEM vs. ALB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAEMALB
Return on Equity (TTM)13.84%-9.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.70%-5.44%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)30.63%-18.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)46.30%-20.78%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.09%7.76%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AEM

2.03

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.04
Median
1.96
Q1
1.42
Min
0.13

AEM’s Current Ratio of 2.03 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ALB

2.31

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
2.38
Median
1.69
Q1
1.42
Min
0.75

ALB’s Current Ratio of 2.31 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AEM vs. ALB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AEM

0.03

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.51
Median
0.33
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, AEM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ALB

0.35

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.53
Q3
1.00
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, ALB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.35 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AEM vs. ALB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AEM

13.07

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
22.73
Median
5.76
Q1
0.82
Min
-21.72

AEM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.07 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ALB

-6.46

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
8.84
Q1
2.54
Min
-9.39

ALB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.46. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AEM vs. ALB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAEMALB
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.032.31
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.071.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.030.35
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.07-6.46

Growth

Revenue Growth

AEM vs. ALB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AEM vs. ALB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AEM

0.84%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.25%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ALB

3.48%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.67%
Median
2.44%
Q1
1.36%
Min
0.00%

ALB’s Dividend Yield of 3.48% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AEM vs. ALB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AEM

23.87%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
62.06%
Median
33.17%
Q1
10.41%
Min
0.00%

AEM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 23.87% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ALB

192.00%

Chemicals Industry

Max
192.00%
Q3
108.95%
Median
57.38%
Q1
27.28%
Min
0.00%

ALB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 192.00% is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AEM vs. ALB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAEMALB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.84%3.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)23.87%192.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AEM

28.52

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
83.04
Q3
41.69
Median
20.30
Q1
12.95
Min
1.75

AEM’s P/E Ratio of 28.52 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ALB

--

Chemicals Industry

Max
49.43
Q3
32.03
Median
21.32
Q1
14.93
Min
8.66

P/E Ratio data for ALB is currently unavailable.

AEM vs. ALB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AEM

8.73

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
4.28
Median
2.37
Q1
0.86
Min
0.16

AEM’s P/S Ratio of 8.73 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ALB

2.05

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.23
Median
1.00
Q1
0.55
Min
0.15

ALB’s P/S Ratio of 2.05 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AEM vs. ALB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AEM

2.58

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.45
Median
1.55
Q1
0.94
Min
0.34

AEM’s P/B Ratio of 2.58 is in the upper tier for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ALB

0.72

Chemicals Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.59
Median
1.50
Q1
0.95
Min
0.30

ALB’s P/B Ratio of 0.72 is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AEM vs. ALB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAEMALB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.52--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.732.05
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.580.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.4828.22