AEM vs. ALB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AEM and ALB, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AEM dominates in value with a market cap of 58.46 billion USD, eclipsing ALB’s 6.64 billion USD by roughly 8.80×.
ALB carries a higher beta at 1.71, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AEM remains steadier at 0.53.
| Symbol | AEM | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | Albemarle Corporation |
| Country | CA | US |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | Gold | Chemicals - Specialty |
| CEO | Mr. Ammar Al-Joundi M.B.A., P.Eng. | Mr. Jerry Kent Masters Jr. |
| Price | 115.63 USD | 56.44 USD |
| Market Cap | 58.46 billion USD | 6.64 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.53 | 1.71 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 1, 1972 | February 22, 1994 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AEM and ALB over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AEM and ALB based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ALB shows a negative P/E of -5.82, highlighting a year of losses, whereas AEM at 24.54 trades on solid profitability.
- AEM posts a negative forward PEG of -4.30, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas ALB at 31.25 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
- ALB reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -47.57, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AEM at 25.14 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | AEM | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 24.54 | -5.82 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -4.30 | 31.25 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 6.54 | 1.30 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.68 | 0.66 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 25.14 | -47.57 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 11.32 | -10.79 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.55 | 1.72 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 25.20 | -62.77 |
Dividend Comparison
ALB stands out with a 2.86% dividend yield—around 107% above AEM’s 1.38%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | AEM | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.38% | 2.86% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AEM and ALB, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AEM meets its interest obligations (ratio 45.23). In stark contrast, ALB’s negative ratio (-9.99) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | AEM | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.37 | 2.11 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.20 | 1.26 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.36 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.04 | 0.21 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 45.23 | -9.99 |