AEM vs. ALB: Agnico Eagle Mines vs. Albemarle Stock Comparison
How do Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) and Albemarle (ALB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) and Albemarle (ALB) both fall under the Materials industry group, but AEM is classified in Metals & Mining while ALB is classified in Chemicals.
| Profile Item | AEM | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | Albemarle Corporation |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Gold | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 96.85 billion USD | 11.71 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | February 22, 1994 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | AEM | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 24.35% | 1.28% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 64.16% | -3.80% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 32.08% | -17.74% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Albemarle (ALB) has an aggressive beta of 1.32, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) is defensive at 0.62 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | AEM | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 49.17% | 53.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.62 | 1.32 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.80% | -83.90% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.33M | 2.40M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | AEM | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.41 | -0.06 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.59 | -0.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 23.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 7.05% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for AEM.
AEM
Materials industry group
23.24%
- Max
- 52.88%
- AEM
- 23.24%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
ALB
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- ALB
- 7.05%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 41.01% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Albemarle (ALB) at 11.08% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.
AEM
Materials industry group
41.01%
- AEM
- 41.01%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
ALB
Materials industry group
11.08%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- ALB
- 11.08%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 55.49% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Albemarle (ALB) at 11.74%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
AEM
Materials industry group
55.49%
- Max
- 66.70%
- AEM
- 55.49%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
ALB
Materials industry group
11.74%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- ALB
- 11.74%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | AEM | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 23.24% | 7.05% |
| ROA (TTM) | 15.80% | 3.95% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 41.01% | 11.08% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 55.49% | 11.74% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 74.52% | 26.17% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 43.71% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at -4.37% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) reports EPS growth of 134.39%, ranked against its industry; Albemarle (ALB) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | AEM | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 43.71% | -4.37% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 27.53% | -11.10% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 134.39% | -- |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 79.58% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 2.75 and Albemarle (ALB) at 2.34 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
AEM
Materials industry group
2.75
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- AEM
- 2.75
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
ALB
Materials industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- ALB
- 2.34
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Albemarle (ALB) at 0.18 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
AEM
Materials industry group
0.01
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- AEM
- 0.01
- Min
- 0.00
ALB
Materials industry group
0.18
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- ALB
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | AEM | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.75 | 2.34 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.01 | 0.18 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.31 | 0.09 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 0.93% and Albemarle (ALB) at 1.65% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
AEM
Materials industry group
0.93%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- AEM
- 0.93%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ALB
Materials industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- ALB
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 14.26% and Albemarle (ALB) at 39.16% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
AEM
Materials industry group
14.26%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- AEM
- 14.26%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ALB
Materials industry group
39.16%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- ALB
- 39.16%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | AEM | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.93% | 1.65% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 14.26% | 39.16% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 15.61 and Albemarle (ALB) at 23.92 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
AEM
Materials industry group
15.61
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- AEM
- 15.61
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
ALB
Materials industry group
23.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- ALB
- 23.92
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Albemarle (ALB) at 1.90 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 6.44 sits in the pricier quartile — AEM costs more per dollar of sales.
AEM
Materials industry group
6.44
- Max
- 9.62
- AEM
- 6.44
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
ALB
Materials industry group
1.90
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- ALB
- 1.90
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) at 3.27 and Albemarle (ALB) at 1.41 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
AEM
Materials industry group
3.27
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- AEM
- 3.27
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
ALB
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- ALB
- 1.41
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | AEM | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 15.61 | 23.92 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 6.44 | 1.90 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.27 | 1.41 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.87% | 10.67% |