AEE vs. ED: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 27, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AEE and ED, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	AEE	ED
Company Name	Ameren Corporation	Consolidated Edison, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Utilities	Utilities
GICS Industry	Multi-Utilities	Multi-Utilities
Market Capitalization	27.24 billion USD	36.05 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	January 2, 1998	January 2, 1962
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AEE and ED by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AEE vs. ED: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	AEE	ED
5-Day Price Return	-1.11%	-1.14%
13-Week Price Return	5.59%	-3.36%
26-Week Price Return	2.89%	4.92%
52-Week Price Return	22.41%	-0.72%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.40%	-3.43%
Year-to-Date Return	13.00%	12.01%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.45M	2.81M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.60M	2.65M
3-Month Volatility	13.89%	15.29%
Beta	0.50	0.32

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AEE

10.12%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 19.69%
Q3: 12.97%
Median: 9.30%
Q1: 7.88%
Min: 4.34%

AEE’s Return on Equity of 10.12% is on par with the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ED

8.48%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 19.69%
Q3: 12.97%
Median: 9.30%
Q1: 7.88%
Min: 4.34%

ED’s Return on Equity of 8.48% is on par with the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AEE vs. ED: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AEE

14.55%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 25.37%
Q3: 15.24%
Median: 8.50%
Q1: 4.09%
Min: -1.05%

AEE’s Net Profit Margin of 14.55% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ED

11.99%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 25.37%
Q3: 15.24%
Median: 8.50%
Q1: 4.09%
Min: -1.05%

ED’s Net Profit Margin of 11.99% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AEE vs. ED: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AEE

19.18%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 43.73%
Q3: 25.91%
Median: 19.49%
Q1: 8.11%
Min: -0.18%

AEE’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.18% is around the midpoint for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ED

17.64%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 43.73%
Q3: 25.91%
Median: 19.49%
Q1: 8.11%
Min: -0.18%

ED’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.64% is around the midpoint for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AEE vs. ED: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AEE	ED
Return on Equity (TTM)	10.12%	8.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.72%	2.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	14.55%	11.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	19.18%	17.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	43.39%	46.69%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AEE

0.80

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 1.64
Q3: 1.22
Median: 0.94
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.50

AEE’s Current Ratio of 0.80 falls into the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ED

1.28

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 1.64
Q3: 1.22
Median: 0.94
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.50

ED’s Current Ratio of 1.28 is in the upper quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AEE vs. ED: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AEE

1.62

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 2.58
Q3: 1.96
Median: 1.56
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.53

AEE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.62 is typical for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ED

1.08

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 2.58
Q3: 1.96
Median: 1.56
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.53

Falling into the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry, ED’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AEE vs. ED: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AEE

3.03

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 12.21
Q3: 7.03
Median: 3.61
Q1: 2.92
Min: 1.62

AEE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.03 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ED

3.23

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 12.21
Q3: 7.03
Median: 3.61
Q1: 2.92
Min: 1.62

ED’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AEE vs. ED: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AEE	ED
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.80	1.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.56	0.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.62	1.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	3.03	3.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

AEE vs. ED: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AEE vs. ED: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AEE

2.69%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 8.75%
Q3: 5.46%
Median: 4.09%
Q1: 2.93%
Min: 0.00%

AEE’s Dividend Yield of 2.69% is in the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ED

3.02%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 8.75%
Q3: 5.46%
Median: 4.09%
Q1: 2.93%
Min: 0.00%

ED’s Dividend Yield of 3.02% is consistent with its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AEE vs. ED: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AEE

60.47%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 128.77%
Q3: 97.17%
Median: 66.46%
Q1: 52.95%
Min: 24.73%

AEE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.47% is within the typical range for the Multi-Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ED

58.59%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 128.77%
Q3: 97.17%
Median: 66.46%
Q1: 52.95%
Min: 24.73%

ED’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 58.59% is within the typical range for the Multi-Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AEE vs. ED: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AEE	ED
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.69%	3.02%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	60.47%	58.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AEE

22.48

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 28.21
Q3: 21.40
Median: 16.89
Q1: 11.54
Min: 5.08

A P/E Ratio of 22.48 places AEE in the upper quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ED

19.38

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 28.21
Q3: 21.40
Median: 16.89
Q1: 11.54
Min: 5.08

ED’s P/E Ratio of 19.38 is within the middle range for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AEE vs. ED: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AEE

3.27

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 4.54
Q3: 3.52
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.50
Min: 0.27

AEE’s P/S Ratio of 3.27 aligns with the market consensus for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ED

2.32

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 4.54
Q3: 3.52
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.50
Min: 0.27

ED’s P/S Ratio of 2.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AEE vs. ED: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AEE

2.11

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 2.70
Q3: 1.97
Median: 1.46
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.86

AEE’s P/B Ratio of 2.11 is in the upper tier for the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ED

1.67

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 2.70
Q3: 1.97
Median: 1.46
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.86

ED’s P/B Ratio of 1.67 is within the conventional range for the Multi-Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AEE vs. ED: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Multi-Utilities industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AEE	ED
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	22.48	19.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	3.27	2.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.11	1.67
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	174.59	145.39