AEE vs. ED: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AEE and ED, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AEE at 26.70 billion USD and ED at 37.91 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
AEE’s beta of 0.52 points to much larger expected swings compared to ED’s calmer 0.28, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AEE | ED |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Ameren Corporation | Consolidated Edison, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Regulated Electric |
| CEO | Mr. Martin J. Lyons Jr. | Mr. Timothy P. Cawley |
| Price | 96.5 USD | 105.22 USD |
| Market Cap | 26.70 billion USD | 37.91 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.52 | 0.28 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | January 2, 1998 | February 15, 2001 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AEE and ED over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AEE and ED based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AEE and ED both consumed more free cash flow than they generated last year—P/FCF of -14.73 and -46.75, respectively—highlighting persistent liquidity pressure.
| Symbol | AEE | ED |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 21.53 | 19.48 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.89 | 3.32 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.38 | 2.40 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 2.13 | 0.00 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -14.73 | -46.75 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 7.45 | 11.33 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 3.38 | 4.06 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -14.72 | -79.07 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AEE and ED offer similar dividend yields (2.82% vs. 3.19%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | AEE | ED |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.82% | 3.19% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AEE and ED, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.86 and 0.00, both AEE and ED have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AEE (quick ratio 0.62) and ED (quick ratio 0.00) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
| Symbol | AEE | ED |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.86 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.62 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 2.30 | 2.30 |