ADSK vs. QNT: Autodesk vs. Quantinuum Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Autodesk (ADSK) and Quantinuum (QNT) both fall under the Software & Services industry group, but ADSK is classified in Software while QNT is classified in IT Services.

Autodesk (ADSK) has been public since June 28, 1985, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Quantinuum (QNT) listed only on June 4, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Quantinuum (QNT) reports a negative beta of -2.69, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Autodesk (ADSK) has a non-negative beta of 1.22.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both ADSK and QNT need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Autodesk (ADSK) earns 53.85% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Quantinuum (QNT) has no ROE this period.

Autodesk (ADSK) at 21.08% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Quantinuum (QNT) at 0.00%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Quantinuum (QNT) reports a negative operating margin of -6,939.56%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Autodesk (ADSK) reports 29.23%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Quantinuum (QNT) at 34.61% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Autodesk (ADSK) at 17.53% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for QNT.

Only one side can be read here: Autodesk (ADSK) reports EPS growth of 2.15%, ranked against its industry; Quantinuum (QNT) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Quantinuum (QNT) at 15.49 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Autodesk (ADSK) at 0.86 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

Quantinuum (QNT) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Autodesk (ADSK) at 1.10 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Autodesk (ADSK) nor Quantinuum (QNT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Autodesk (ADSK) nor Quantinuum (QNT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Autodesk (ADSK) trades at 33.95 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Quantinuum (QNT) has no P/E ratio this period.

Autodesk (ADSK) at 7.02 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Quantinuum (QNT) at 441.11 clears its benchmark range — QNT looks notably rich on sales.

Both look rich against book: Autodesk (ADSK) at 16.17 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Quantinuum (QNT) at 64.89 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Valuation Metrics