ADSK vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ADSK and QBTS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ADSK dwarfs QBTS in market cap, clocking in at 62.67 billion USD—about 14.13 times the 4.43 billion USD of its counterpart.
ADSK rides a wilder wave with a beta of 1.47, hinting at bigger swings than QBTS’s steadier 0.89.
Symbol | ADSK | QBTS |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Autodesk, Inc. | D-Wave Quantum Inc. |
Country | US | CA |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Software - Application | Computer Hardware |
CEO | Dr. Andrew Anagnost Ph.D. | Dr. Alan E. Baratz Ph.D. |
Price | 292.93 USD | 15.36 USD |
Market Cap | 62.67 billion USD | 4.43 billion USD |
Beta | 1.473 | 0.886 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | June 28, 1985 | December 11, 2020 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ADSK and QBTS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ADSK and QBTS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- QBTS shows a negative P/E of -33.33, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, ADSK at 56.64 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
- QBTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -84.98, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, ADSK at 39.99 maintains a positive cash position.
Symbol | ADSK | QBTS |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 56.64 | -33.33 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.08 | 1.25 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 10.22 | 207.56 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 24.03 | 21.21 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 39.99 | -84.98 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 41.48 | -30.97 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 10.38 | 193.69 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 40.61 | -79.30 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ADSK nor QBTS pays dividends, suggesting both reinvest all profits into growth—likely expansion or innovation—favoring long-term value over immediate income.
Symbol | ADSK | QBTS |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ADSK and QBTS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ADSK posts a current ratio of 0.68 under 1, where current assets fall short of covering short-term debts—manageable perhaps with solid cash inflows. Compare that to QBTS, sitting at 20.73, where liabilities are comfortably met.
- ADSK’s quick ratio sits at 0.68 below 0.8, leaving its cash and near-cash assets shy of short-term obligations—potentially a stretch without extra funds. Meanwhile, QBTS lands at 20.61, with enough liquidity to spare.
- ADSK’s interest coverage reads “--”, suggesting interest expenses are next to nothing—think tiny debt or ultra-low rates—while QBTS at -28.05 teeters below 1.5, earnings barely clearing interest.
Symbol | ADSK | QBTS |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 20.73 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 20.61 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.98 | 0.04 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.24 | 0.02 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -28.05 |