ADSK vs. ERIC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ADSK and ERIC, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ADSK dominates in value with a market cap of 62.67 billion USD, eclipsing ERIC’s 29.42 billion USD by roughly 2.13×.
ADSK’s beta of 1.47 points to much larger expected swings compared to ERIC’s calmer 0.44, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
ERIC is an ADR, letting U.S. buyers tap its non-U.S. business directly, unlike ADSK, which is purely domestic.
| Symbol | ADSK | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Autodesk, Inc. | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) |
| Country | US | SE |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | Communication Equipment |
| CEO | Dr. Andrew Anagnost Ph.D. | Mr. Anthony F. Bartolo |
| Price | 292.93 USD | 8.86 USD |
| Market Cap | 62.67 billion USD | 29.42 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.47 | 0.44 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | June 28, 1985 | August 24, 1981 |
| ADR | No | Yes |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ADSK and ERIC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ADSK and ERIC based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ERIC features a high P/E of 175.26, indicating strong growth expectations, compared to ADSK at 56.64, which trades at a more standard valuation based on its current earnings.
- ERIC shows a negative forward PEG of -63.14, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ADSK at 4.08 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | ADSK | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 56.64 | 175.26 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.08 | -63.14 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 10.22 | 1.13 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 24.03 | 3.28 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 39.99 | 6.70 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 41.48 | 6.10 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 10.38 | 1.12 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 40.61 | 6.64 |
Dividend Comparison
ADSK offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while ERIC provides a 3.28% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ADSK | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 3.28% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ADSK and ERIC, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ADSK’s current ratio of 0.68 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while ERIC at 1.09 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- ADSK’s quick ratio of 0.68 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ERIC at 0.88 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- ADSK shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas ERIC (at 6.76) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ADSK | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 1.09 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 0.88 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.98 | 0.49 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.24 | 0.15 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 6.76 |